Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
736.  At the FCO Iraq Morning Meeting on 4 March, Mr Chilcott described Mr Brenton’s
report on the evolving views of US Principals as:
“… a further good example of even the most senior levels of the US Administration
showing themselves open to good arguments firmly put at the right time. We needed
to go on making these arguments.”322
Growing pressure for Ministerial decisions
737.  Mr Blair produced a manuscript Note on 3 March setting out a list of potential
actions to help secure Security Council support for the second resolution. Potential
actions included agreeing:
a UN role in post-conflict Iraq;
a broad-based government;
the humanitarian effort.323
738.  Mr Blair’s Note is addressed in more detail in Section 3.7.
739.  On 4 March, Mr Ricketts told Mr Straw that he and Sir David Manning had
discussed advice from Sir Jeremy Greenstock on the second resolution and believed
that the “best package” might include for the US to make clear that it “accepted a
significant UN role in post-conflict Iraq”.324
740.  On 3 March, the AHGI advised Sir David Manning that Ministers needed to
give their urgent attention to the possibility that the UK could be running an area
of Iraq within weeks.
741.  The record of the 28 February meeting of the AHGI was sent to Sir David Manning
on 3 March.325 On the question of the UK assuming responsibility for a sector of Iraq it
stated:
“Although military action is not certain, we may be confronted with the realities
of running a part of Iraq within weeks.
“The question of geographical sectors, whether for security or to provide civilian
government as well, whether we should offer to lead one and how much it would
cost, is of increasing concern. The US military plan, which has been adopted, has
the UK running a sector covering a significant part of Iraq. In the event of war, UK
forces will end in occupying part of Iraq, but a sector covering four provinces, as the
US propose, is probably beyond our national capacity. There are concerns in home
departments about implications for their resources of any commitment to provide
322 Minute Tanfield to PS/PUS [FCO], 4 March 2003, ‘Iraq Morning Meeting: Key Points’.
323 Note [Blair], 3 March 2003, [untitled].
324 Minute Ricketts to PS/Straw, 4 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UN Tactics’.
325 Minute Dodd to Manning, 3 March 2003, ‘Ad Hoc Group on Iraq’.
444
Previous page | Contents | Next page