Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
608.  DFID also stated that the military would need adequate plans to deal with the
civilian impact of CBW use before the UN and NGOs arrived. More generally, the role
of UN agencies and NGOs would be determined by the extent of UN cover. There were
also “severe doubts about the adequacy of US humanitarian preparations”.
609.  Mr Blair’s question about the plan for addressing humanitarian issues was
answered in one sentence:
“DFID is planning to work primarily through UN agencies, unless extra financial
resources are available, in which case a more active bilateral role in any
UK‑controlled zone could be considered.”
A UN “badge” for post-conflict Iraq
610.  Mr Blair raised the importance of a UN “badge” with Gen Franks on
25 February.
611.  He told Parliament later the same day that the UN must have a “key role” in
post-conflict Iraq and that discussions were under way on exactly what that role
would be.
612.  Sir David Manning explained to Dr Rice that Mr Blair attached importance to
the UN’s role, but was clear that UN involvement must not be at the expense of
efficient administration and effective reconstruction.
613.  On 25 February, Mr Blair told Gen Franks that he “still hoped that the UN could be
brought on board” and that: “In any post-Saddam administration, the UN ‘badge’ would
help pull the international community, including the Arabs and European public opinion
back on board.”263
614.  Mr Blair and Gen Franks also discussed the possibility that “an occupation could
work in several ways on a continuum from a US occupation of Japan model downwards”
and that “it was important to work on the details, to avoid any perception of a US
occupation”.
615.  Mr Watkins informed Mr Hoon (who was due to meet Gen Franks in Qatar on
26 February) that, during a meeting earlier in the day, Gen Franks had told Adm Boyce
that Iraq would need to be under Coalition control for some time, during which there
would need to be discussion with the UN on establishing a UN mandate.264 Gen Franks
had added that, contrary to press speculation, the US was not seriously considering
anything along the lines of post-Second World War Germany or Japan. He had also
agreed with a comment from Mr Webb that, in order to convince regional opinion of its
intent, the US needed to start talking to the UN, but the US did not want to do anything
263 Letter Cannon to Owen, 25 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s meeting with General Franks’.
264 Minute Watkins to Secretary of State [MOD], 25 February 2003, ‘Meeting with General Franks:
26 February’.
418
Previous page | Contents | Next page