Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
379.  The paper listed seven immediate military priorities in the aftermath of hostilities:
“a. provide for the security of friendly forces;
b. contribute to the creation of a secure environment so that normal life can be
restored;
c. work in support of humanitarian organisations to mitigate the consequences
of hostilities and, in the absence of such civilian humanitarian capacity, provide
relief where it is needed;
d. work with UNMOVIC/IAEA to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction and
their means of delivery;
e. facilitate remedial action where environmental damage has occurred;
f. enable the reconstruction and recommissioning of essential infrastructure for
the political and economic development of Iraq, and the immediate benefit of
the Iraqi people; and
g. lay plans for the reform of Iraq’s security forces.”
380.  The paper stated that:
Those tasks would, “wherever possible”, be carried out in co-operation with
the UN.
UK military forces would withdraw as soon as possible.
The UK hoped to see early establishment of a transitional civilian administration.
The UK would work with the international community to build the widest
possible international and regional support for reconstruction and the move to
representative government.
381.  The paper concluded with the 7 January description of the desired end state for
a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq (see Section 6.4).
382.  On 12 February, the Chiefs of Staff noted that work on the UK objectives paper had
been concluded, but not finally endorsed. The paper would be “ready for release at the
start of any offensive campaign”.180
383.  Mr Hoon discussed the objectives with Secretary Rumsfeld in Washington on
12 February.181
180 Minutes, 12 February 2003, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
181 Letter Manning to Rice, 14 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
375
Previous page | Contents | Next page