Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
371.  In his advice to Mr Straw, Mr Chaplin had argued against avoiding all mention of
regime change:
“It seems to me unrealistic to expect that the Americans will sign up to a common
set of campaign objectives which does not include explicit mention of regime change
(put in the context of disarmament), especially once military action has begun. At
that point it would be very difficult to claim publicly that, although we were taking part
in military action, we did not intend or expect the regime to fall.”174
372.  Mr O’Brien had proposed specific wording to Mr Straw that “should satisfy the
Americans but stop short of making regime change an explicit element of UK objectives”
by establishing more clearly that regime change was needed to secure long-term
disarmament:
“The UK’s overall objective for the military campaign is to create the conditions in
which Iraq disarms in accordance with its obligations under UNSCRs [UN Security
Council resolutions] and creates the circumstances in which Iraq remains disarmed
in the long-term.”175
373.  Mr Straw included that proposal in a letter to Mr Blair on 11 February, in which he
expressed “serious concerns” about the presentation of military campaign objectives:
“It is particularly important to explain carefully any reference to regime change. We
must underline that this is only necessary because Iraq has consistently refused
to comply with UN Security Council resolutions. Otherwise people here and in the
region will assume that we had been intent on regime change all along.”176
374.  The MOD comments on the draft objectives had focused on whether they provided
“enough top cover to derive appropriate CDS and targeting directives to enable us to
work in coalition with the US”.177
375.  DFID had proposed the addition of references to:
addressing, rather than minimising, any adverse humanitarian consequences of
the military campaign;
demonstrating to the Iraqi people, rather than reassuring them, that their security
and well-being was the UK’s concern; and
ensuring that sanctions were lifted and that the OFF programme and resources
were available to meet the needs of the Iraqi people.178
174 Minute Chaplin to PS [FCO], 4 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
175 Minute [FCO junior official] to Private Secretary [FCO], 7 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign
Objectives’.
176 Letter Straw to Prime Minister, 10 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’ attaching
Paper [unattributed], ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
177 Letter Lee to Bowen, 4 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
178 Letter Brewer to Bowen, 4 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Campaign Objectives’.
373
Previous page | Contents | Next page