Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
346.  The British Embassy Washington reported that on 12 February Mr Hoon raised
the issue of financing reconstruction from oil sales with Secretary Rumsfeld, who
agreed that oil proceeds were key and should not be misinterpreted as a reason for
the conflict.164 DoD would make it clear that oil proceeds should go to Iraq’s people.
OFF was a good basis on which to work.
347.  The Embassy also reported agreement during Mr Hoon’s talks with Secretary
Rumsfeld and Dr Rice that “broad UN cover for day after management in Iraq would
bring political, financial and legal benefits. But this cover should not come with inefficient
micro-management by UN agencies.”165 The Embassy commented that, although ORHA
remained “disputed turf” and Mr Hoon had heard conflicting accounts of its role while in
Washington, it would be the “key body in ruling and reconstructing a defeated Iraq”. The
UK was “slightly ahead of the game” in already having Maj Gen Cross there, but the US
would welcome more UK secondees.
348.  Neither the Embassy’s report of Mr Hoon’s meeting with Secretary Rumsfeld nor
the record written by Mr Peter Watkins, Mr Hoon’s Principal Private Secretary, referred
to any discussion of de-Ba’athification.166
349.  Mr Hoon told the Inquiry that, at the meeting, he handed Secretary Rumsfeld
a paper which, while not using the word “de-Ba’athification”, had:
“… emphasised … that there would be people who had joined the Ba’ath Party …
not because they necessarily were enthusiastic supporters of Saddam Hussein,
and we felt that there ought to be a distinction between those who were enthusiastic
supporters and those who simply joined the party in order to gain position … and
I think a similar argument arises in relation to the army”.167
350.  The Inquiry has been unable to identify the paper handed over by Mr Hoon.
351.  During Mr Hoon’s meeting with Dr Rice she expressed concern that the existing
military campaign plan for the South of Iraq assumed local administrators would remain
in place. Her assessment was that those individuals, who were mainly Sunni in an
otherwise Shia area, would flee after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime.168
Mr Hoon’s response was to point to the value of achieving UN cover for Coalition
operations in Iraq.
164 Telegram 203 Washington to FCO London, 13 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Defence Secretary’s Visit to
Washington’.
165 Telegram 204 Washington to FCO London, 13 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Defence Secretary’s Visit to
Washington: Day After Management’.
166 Minute Watkins to Policy Director, 13 February 2003, ‘Meeting with Donald Rumsfeld:
12 February 2003’.
167 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, page 160.
168 Letter Watkins to Manning, 13 February 2003, ‘Defence Secretary’s call on Condi Rice:
12 February 2003’.
370
Previous page | Contents | Next page