Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
137.  Officials explained that operational planning was constrained by the
continuing absence of an overall framework for post-conflict Iraq.
138.  Section 3.6 describes the range of advice prepared for Mr Blair’s meeting with
President Bush on 31 January.
139.  Advice on post-conflict issues was included in a number of documents prepared
separately by the FCO, the MOD, the Cabinet Office and DFID.
140.  Briefing prepared by the FCO included in its list of objectives: “To convince
President Bush … the US needs to pay much more attention, quickly, to planning on
‘day after’ issues; and that the UN needs to be central to it.”74 Key messages included:
“– Our officials … need agreement from us [Mr Blair and President Bush] on overall
framework to carry out operational planning.
– Coalition needs an overall ‘winning concept’. Should embrace both military
action and ‘day-after’ administration in Iraq. Would be pointless and damaging
to win war and lose peace.
– Would be irresponsible to abandon Iraq quickly after toppling Saddam. Risk of
civil war would be real. And Iraq’s neighbours would get dragged in, creating
instability in the whole region.
– We must leave Iraq and region better off after our intervention. As well as
disposing of Iraq’s WMD and its oppressive security forces that means presiding
over wide political and economic reforms. Will take time to introduce and take
root, and will go beyond a military occupation. So international community is in
for long haul.
– All the evidence from the region suggests that Coalition forces will not be seen
as liberators for long, if at all. Our motives are regarded with huge suspicion.
The Iraqis, including those in exile, (and the Arabs more generally) want us gone
quickly. Our occupation and administration of Iraq will become more unpopular
and its lawfulness more debatable, the longer it continues.
– Blunt fact is that in those circumstances any reforms are unlikely to stick.
Iraqis will need legitimate international presence holding the ring while they
themselves set up new, Iraqi, structures. Can’t foist these on them. Iraqi
opposition groups can be involved but should not be parachuted into power.
– So we should plan to keep period of government by military Coalition as short as
possible, and introduce quickly an international administration with UN blessing.
74 Paper Middle East Department, 30 January 2003, ‘Prime Minister’s visit to Camp David,
31 January: Iraq’.
334
Previous page | Contents | Next page