Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
44.  Ms Carolyn Miller, DFID Director Middle East and North Africa and the DFID
member of the UK delegation, informed Ms Short that the annotated agenda had been
“put together rapidly”, but DFID had been able to feed in a number of points, including:
“… the importance of establishing a secure environment for humanitarian aid;
the need to factor in the risks of operating if CBW are used; the requirement for
affordable financing arrangements for relief and reconstruction especially if OFF
collapses; and the importance of moving from dependence on handouts to an
Iraq‑led economic recovery”.21
45.  Separate MOD briefing for the Washington talks listed questions to which “we
must first have answers” before the UK assumed post-conflict responsibilities:
the future of the Iraq military, police and local and regional government;
the legal basis for Coalition involvement in civil security;
military sectors;
the military’s role in managing oil production; and
when humanitarian agencies would take the lead in providing assistance.
46.  The briefing prepared for Mr Lee, the senior MOD member of the UK delegation
for Washington, included “baseline assumptions” for UK force contributions in four
post-conflict phases. The briefing stated that, in the absence of a US decision on
timelines, the assumptions were only illustrative.22
47.  The suggested UK land force contribution under each phase was:
US military administration (0-6 months): war-fighting forces (large scale);23
Coalition administration (6-12 months): large scale reducing to medium scale;24
civil administration (12-24 months): medium scale reducing to small scale;25 and
full Iraqi governance (24 months plus): small scale reducing to advisory teams.
48.  The briefing stated that the UK military would: “Take regional responsibility for AM
[aftermath] operations in our current War-fighting JOA [Joint Operational Area], at least
for the first six months.” Military tasks would include setting the conditions for successful
DDR/SSR (Security Sector Reform) programmes. The military would also support a civil/
NGO lead in:
humanitarian operations, including distribution of food and water, provision of
shelter and control of internally displaced persons;
21 Minute Miller to PS/Secretary of State [DFID], 18 January 2003, ‘UK/US/Australia talks in Washington:
22 January’.
22 Minute Sec(O)4 to DG Op Pol, 21 January 2003, ‘Visit to Washington – Iraq Aftermath’.
23 Defined in the 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) as deployments of division size or equivalent.
24 Defined in the 1998 SDR as “deployments of brigade size or equivalent” for war-fighting or other
operations.
25 Defined in the 1998 SDR as “a deployment of battalion size or equivalent”.
318
Previous page | Contents | Next page