Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
be involved, both in mandating any stabilisation and reconstruction activities and in
overseeing them.
“… Unexpectedly, the FCO have just decided that they wish to seek the Foreign
Secretary’s approval for the general line they wish to take in discussion … that we
should be pressing the US to follow a UN rather than a unilateral US-led route, in
dealing with day-after issues. The FCO take the line that any unilateral US plan
would lack international legitimacy, and that without an agreed Coalition approach
the legal basis on which our own forces might operate would be at best unclear and
possibly unsafe.”
41.  Mr Pollard stated that there was “some force” in the FCO argument and that
Mr Ian Lee, MOD Director General Operational Policy (DG OpPol), was content to
take part in the Washington talks on that basis.
42.  Mr Pollard advised that the FCO was likely to brief Mr Straw to follow up the talks
with Secretary Powell and was also expected to put post-conflict issues on the agenda
for Mr Blair’s meeting with President Bush on 31 January. The MOD would be closely
associated with the drafting of that advice. Mr Lee would advise on his return from
Washington whether Mr Hoon should raise the issue in his weekly telephone call to
Mr Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense.
43.  Sir Kevin Tebbit, MOD Permanent Under Secretary (PUS),19 commented separately
to Mr Hoon:
“My main observation on what is a good paper is that this rather underplays the
fissiparous tendencies within Iraq and the risk that groups are as likely to fight each
other as Coalition forces. More detailed work is needed in my view on how to keep
Kurds, Turkomans, Shia, Sunni and, perhaps Southern Marsh Shia together in one
national entity – and indeed to handle those other three groups – people bent on
revenge against S[addam] H[ussein]’s regime relics, and the outsiders/exiles who
may find themselves less welcome than they expect. All points to the need for a very
strong initial security presence, with a clear link to the political reform process. A still
stronger case in my view for the US to want a wider Coalition, made possible under
UN auspices.”20
19 In keeping with variations in use within departments, the Inquiry refers to the most senior civil servant
in the FCO and the MOD as the Permanent Under Secretary (PUS), but in all other departments as the
Permanent Secretary. The Permanent Under Secretaries and Permanent Secretaries are referred to
collectively as Permanent Secretaries.
20 Manuscript comment Tebbit on Minute Chilcott to Private Secretary [FCO], 17 January 2003,
‘Iraq: Day‑After Issues’.
317
Previous page | Contents | Next page