Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
b. That the UK role should be to develop and sustain a broad international coalition
to deal with the humanitarian crisis in co-operation with the UN and other key
international players.”
It added:
“Assumption a) is credible if the UN has a mandate and active support from its
members to do so. The situation might be different in the event of military action not
backed by the UN. Assumption b) is in line with current UK humanitarian policy.”
624.  The draft listed possible humanitarian consequences of military action, including:
large-scale civilian loss of life;
internal and international population displacement;
significant infrastructure and environmental damage;
inter-factional clashes within Iraq; and
use of chemical and biological weapons.
Likely emergency requirements included provision of basic needs and: “Early focus on
recovery initiatives, particularly linking into infrastructure and environmental damage,
and the impact on livelihoods.”
625.  The draft explained that DFID’s Conflict and Humanitarian Affairs Department
(CHAD) was undertaking a “short-term desktop study of the humanitarian situation” in
central and southern Iraq. If restrictions on external contacts with humanitarian agencies
were lifted, CHAD would obtain a fuller picture of contingency planning and agency
capacities. The CHAD Operations Team (OT) was accelerating its post-Afghanistan refit
and being brought up to its full authorised strength of 30.
626.  The draft also stated that:
“Any large-scale UK humanitarian response would require additional funding from
the Central Reserve. DFID’s existing small (£6m) humanitarian programme in Iraq
is fully committed; available humanitarian funds within CHAD are likely to be grossly
insufficient and most of DFID’s contingency reserve has already been allocated.”
627.  The draft paper did not consider whether there was a need for contingency
plans should either of the underlying assumptions prove wrong.
628.  The Inquiry has seen no indication that DFID addressed that possibility in
any detail until February 2003.
DFID PAPER: ‘CENTRAL/SOUTHERN IRAQ HUMANITARIAN SITUATION ANALYSIS’
629.  The DFID desktop analysis of central and southern Iraq highlighted
the extent of economic decline, the deterioration in public services and the
vulnerability of the population.
220
Previous page | Contents | Next page