Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.4  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001 to January 2003
The potential scale of the post-conflict task
413.  During late August and early September, UK analysts advised on:
the likely need for sustained international commitment to Iraq’s
reconstruction;
the importance of starting preparations early; and
the need for greater clarity on US thinking.
414.  An FCO paper on the economic consequences of military action assessed
that “an enormous task of reconstruction and economic and financial
normalisation” lay ahead. If serious preparatory work did not begin many
months before regime change, there was likely to be a “serious and politically
embarrassing hiatus”.
415.  A paper by Treasury officials compared the reconstruction of Iraq with
Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and East Timor. It concluded that reconstruction in Iraq
could prove more expensive, but might also be less challenging.
FCO PAPER: ‘REGIONAL ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF MILITARY ACTION
AGAINST IRAQ’
416.  On 29 August, the FCO Economic Adviser for the Middle East and North Africa
produced an assessment of short- and long-term economic consequences of military
action for the region and for Iraq.233 The paper identified a number of priorities for the
UK, including mobilising the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank as
soon as possible to begin building up a picture of Iraq’s economy:
“An enormous task of reconstruction and economic and financial normalisation lies
ahead. For all Iraq’s oil wealth it will take many years before the country can get
back to levels of prosperity seen in the 1990s.
“... [T]here will be a huge job of reforming Iraqi economic policies and institutions:
dismantling Ba’ath Party economic control and corruption and replacing it with
competent, transparent market-orientated management will probably be akin to
dismantling Communist Party control in Central and Eastern Europe. A strategy
for reconstruction and long-term development will have to be worked out.
“... [T]here is a desperate shortage of available information on Iraq’s economy
which will delay assessment of both the financial position and the requirement for
institutional change/technical assistance. Unless serious preparatory work is put
in hand many months before regime change there is likely to be a serious and
politically embarrassing hiatus.”
233  Minute Economic Policy Department [junior official] to Gray, 29 August 2002, ‘Iraq: economic issues
raised by military action and regime change’ attaching paper, undated, ‘Regional economic consequences
of military action against Iraq’.
181
Previous page | Contents | Next page