Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
US and UK planning machinery
70.  US planning machinery was reorganised a number of times during 2002 and 2003:
Before August 2002, two separate planning processes operated in parallel in the
State Department and the Department of Defense (DoD).
Between August 2002 and January 2003, greater inter-agency co-ordination
was loosely overseen by an Executive Steering Group of the National Security
Council (NSC). The US Agency for International Development (USAID) was
brought into the planning process for the first time.
From January 2003, all post-conflict planning was consolidated under Mr Donald
Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense.58
71.  The UK introduced significant changes to its planning machinery in September 2002
and February 2003, in part to reflect US reorganisation:
Until September 2002, a tightly held process was largely confined to No.10
and the MOD, with some work in the FCO and limited Whitehall co-ordination
through the MOD-based Pigott Group (described later in this Section) and the
Cabinet Office OD Sec.
Between September 2002 and February 2003, the AHGI co-ordinated Whitehall
planning at official level. DFID, the Treasury and other departments were
brought into the planning process for the first time. The MOD attended the AHGI,
but planning for military operations continued on a separate track.
From February 2003, the inter-departmental Iraq Planning Unit (IPU), located
in the FCO, but including staff from the MOD and DFID, was responsible
for Whitehall planning for civilian aspects of post-conflict Iraq, with the MOD
continuing to lead on military planning.
72.  Those changes are described in more detail later in this Section and in Section 6.5.
The US approach to nation-building
73.  The future President Bush expressed his opposition to US military involvement in
post-conflict nation-building during the 2000 US presidential election.
74.  In October 2000, Governor George W Bush cited the US military intervention in
Somalia in 1992 and 1993 as an example of why the US military should not be involved
in nation-building.59 He said that what had started as a humanitarian mission:
“… changed into a nation-building mission, and that’s where the mission went
wrong. The mission was changed. And as a result, our nation paid a price. And so
58  Bowen SW Jr. Hard Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience. U.S. Government Printing
Office, 2009.
59  Commission on Presidential Debates, 11 October 2000, October 11, 2000 Debate Transcript:
The Second Gore-Bush Presidential Debate.
126
Previous page | Contents | Next page