Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
466.  Lt Gen Reith provided specific briefing that:
Combat availability of both Challenger 2 and AS90 tanks was “very high” and
the desertisation and protection measures for Challenger 2 were fitted before
war‑fighting. The AS90 desertisation measure was not completed until 4 May
“but was not required for war-fighting, although it would have been if hostilities
had continued as had been expected”.
The supply of Combat ID was “over-taut” but 1 (UK) Div reported that “there was
just enough for equipment in the direct fire zone”. The late arrival was due to
distribution problems but, where it was supplied, it had been effective.
There had been a shortfall of ComboPens that was addressed by the issue of
“out-of-date pens” as a “last resort”. The shortfall was “traceable to enduring
manufacturing difficulties, acknowledged in early 02”. Alternative provision was
being considered but was proving problematic.
The respirator testing kits had arrived in theatre between 24 February and
7 March “but were subject to a delay in distribution because of the large
amounts of higher priority stores, such as CR2 [Challenger 2] and Combat ID
UOR equipment”.
467.  Lt Gen Reith wrote:
“I draw two valuable lessons from this work:
“(a) In future, we should try to be less reliant on UORs for operations; fitting these in
the time available and in austere conditions further stretches an already over-loaded
logistic organisation. Thus, there is a strong case for better resourcing and I hope
this point now will be accepted where it perhaps has not been in the past.
“(b) ‘Just enough just in time’ is probably a flawed policy for military operations.
SDR directed that the DLO should only hold that which could not be procured
within readiness and preparation time. However, the stock levels held speak
for themselves.”
468.  Lt Gen Reith added that both points had been “exacerbated by the understandable
reluctance of Ministers to go early to industry … before formal committal to the
operation”. He also wrote that the military’s commitment was, “as often happens,
at a scale beyond that envisaged in the DPAs and thus not fully resourced”.
469.  Lt Gen Reith reiterated those points on 16 May when he produced a “Top 10
Lessons Identified” document for the DOC.228
228  Minute CJO to DOC, 16 May 03, ‘Operation TELIC –“Top 10” Lessons Identified – Pre-Deployment
and Deployment Phases’.
74
Previous page | Contents | Next page