Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Iraq at the Crossroads:
State and Society in the Shadow of Regime Change
Mr David Ochmanek, a senior analyst at RAND and a former member of the US Air
Force and a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy in the Pentagon from
1993 to 1995, concluded that a robust invasion force would be needed because Saddam
Hussein’s troops were “unlikely to crack unless faced with an overwhelming adversary”.157
Dr Toby Dodge, a Research Fellow at the ESRC Centre for the Study of Globalisation
and Regionalisation, University of Warwick, wrote that the Iraqi regime had sacrificed the
military efficiency of the Iraqi armed forces to ensure they did not pose a threat to Saddam
Hussein’s continued rule. That meant that although conventional military opposition to an
invasion might be short lived, a coup launched against the regime from within the security
services would happen, if at all, in the final moments of any war. The military campaign
would be fought in the cities of Iraq, primarily Baghdad, against a background of intense
media coverage.
Dr Faleh A. Jaber, an Iraqi sociologist based in London, argued that the Iraqi Army might
react in ways comparable to 1991 with sections opting for mutiny, some surrendering and
others fighting to defend the Government. A coup was unlikely unless the US succeeded
in attracting a considerable segment of the “ruling tribal alliance” to its side.
In a separate essay, Dr Jaber concluded that, in the light of the inherent weakness of
organised political parties in the South, the response to an invasion could range from
sustained, organised or disorganised rebellions to mob-like violence or gangster-like
retribution. That would help bring Ba’athist rule to an end, but could also bring forward
unfettered chaos.
Several contributors to the Adelphi Paper warned of the potential for violent disorder in
post-conflict Iraq (see Section 6.5).
446.  Mr Blair read the Adelphi Paper in mid-February and asked a number of
questions, including:
What is our military’s assessment of the likely consequences of an attack
on Iraq; ie how many casualties; how quickly the collapse?
Why do we not think the SRG [Special Republican Guard] will dig in, inside
Baghdad and fight a guerrilla campaign?
What is the prospect of a pre-emptive BW or CW attack on our troops in Kuwait,
and are we certain we are adequately prepared and our troops protected?
Why will the 2,000 key individuals and the 26,000 SRG personnel … not fight
to the death, given the hatred of them by ordinary Iraqis?”158
157  Dodge T & Simon S (eds). Iraq at the Crossroads: State and Society in the Shadow of Regime Change.
IISS Adelphi Paper 354. Oxford University Press, January 2003.
158  Letter Rycroft to McDonald, 20 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Political and Military Questions’.
454
Previous page | Contents | Next page