Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
411.  Lord Boyce explained: “I thought we would be there for three or four years at least,
and said so at the time.” He added:
“The theoretical planning against the Defence Planning Assumptions is you don’t
do this sort of operation for an extended period longer than about six months. But it
never seemed to me very likely that we would be out [of] there in six months.”
412.  Asked about the assumption that the UK contingent would reduce to “Brigade
level” or “medium scale”, Lord Boyce replied:
“For the job that we would have to do in the Basra area, it might have been that
a Brigade size might have been sufficient, as conditions pertained in the middle
of 2003.”148
413.  On 20 February, Mr Dominick Chilcott, Head of the IPU, sent Mr Straw an IPU
guidance note for officials taking part in the Rock Drill.149
414.  Mr Chilcott’s covering minute to Mr Straw stated:
“There is barely any mention of the UN in the CENTCOM plans we have seen for
Phase IV (post-conflict) to date. But there are gaps in the plan, which is still fluid and
which we have the opportunity to influence. We shall encourage the US players at
the Rock Drill to draw the conclusion that the job of administering Iraq is too large
even for the US to undertake, that putting together a large Coalition – drawing on
Arab countries – is the key to success, and that this can only be achieved by getting
UN authorisation for Phase IV.”
415.  The attached guidance note stated that the UK and US agreed that “there must be
a phased approach to the ‘day after’”. For the UK, that meant “(a) military administration,
(b) a UN transitional administration and (c) handover of power to a new Iraqi
government”. The US referred to “stabilisation”, “recovery” and “transition to security”.
416.  On sectorisation, the guidance stated:
UK will have, in the very short term, to administer the area where its forces are
at the end of hostilities. No commitment to administer divisional size area in the
medium to longer term. More likely a small area around Basra.
No commitment to administering any part of Baghdad.
Where we are involved in administration, will want to be so in an
exemplary fashion.”
417.  The guidance stated that the UK force would reduce from large scale (three
brigades plus) to medium scale (one brigade plus), “if possible by the autumn”.
148  Public hearing, 3 December 2009, page 102.
149  Minute Chilcott to Private Secretary [FCO], 20 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Day-After (Phase IV)’ attaching
Paper [unattributed and undated], ‘Iraq Day After: Guidance for Officials at US ROCK Drill’.
448
Previous page | Contents | Next page