Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
1038.  Mr Hoon was advised on 14 November that:
“While it seemed likely that Turkey would accept US forces, negotiations would be
protracted. The extent to which the US would press the Turks on our behalf was
not clear.”415
1039.  The “public posture on specific military preparations” should remain “low key”.
1040.  Lt Gen Reith proposed that options in the South should also be explored.
1041.  The paper considering options for a UK land contribution, submitted by
Lt Gen Reith to the Chiefs of Staff on 18 November, advised that many of the
assumptions behind the force levels in Package 3 offered to the Americans for planning
purposes were no longer valid.416 The US had “embraced the wider significance of
the North” and allocated a US division to that axis, but it had withdrawn the offer of
a US armoured brigade operating under UK command. The northern option would
require a Corps level (three‑star) HQ, which had “yet to be found”; and there was a
US aspiration that the UK would contribute to and lead any “three-star” HQ in the
North. The uncertainties about Turkish co‑operation were also “a concern, preventing
reconnaissance and creating logistic uncertainty”.
1042.  PJHQ had, therefore, “developed” four potential courses of action “in line with
current US thinking: one in the North and three in the South, which were “feasible,
although they [would] all require provision of an additional manoeuvre brigade”.
1043.  In the South, the UK would operate under US command. The paper expanded
on the advantages and disadvantages of each course of action, including whether they
offered a “high profile and worthwhile role” for the UK.
1044.  Lt Gen Reith wrote:
“Without Turkish co‑operation, UK forces may be either excluded from participation
or, if agreement is reached late, have their ability to participate in the early stages
of the campaign in the North compromised. This would impact on the strategic
simultaneity the plan is designed to achieve. To date, UK policy has been to allow
the US to act as the principal interlocutors … The results … have left our position
uncertain.
“… If a decision is not made soon, the UK may need to engage directly with Tu[rkey]
to achieve resolution.”
1045.  Lt Gen Reith recommended discounting options of integrating a UK brigade
within a US division in the North and a UK division operating independently of the
US. He suggested that it would be “feasible” for the UK and US to construct a Corps
415 Minute Watkins to DG Op Pol, 14 November 2002, ‘Iraq: Ministerial Briefing’.
416 Minute CJO to DCDS(C), 18 November 2002, ‘Options for the UK Land Contribution’.
332
Previous page | Contents | Next page