Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
planning by default, and Adm Boyce’s advice in Mr Blair’s meeting on 31 October
that US planning was proceeding on the basis that there would not be a UK land
contribution.
954.  Mr Hoon’s oral evidence to the Inquiry suggested that the US had given
the impression that, in the absence of a firm decision, it was discounting a UK
contribution.
955.  Mr Hoon told the Inquiry that, in October, the UK had:
“… pretty much assumed that the Americans had discounted the prospect of …
[Package 3] and were planning without our involvement, simply because we
had not taken the decisions that were required in the timescale that was at that
stage required.”376
956.  Mr Hoon stated:
“… by October … we had had this discussion on several occasions … my
understanding, by the middle of October, was that the Americans were assuming
we wouldn’t be there … on the land [option] … So essentially … what I was really
saying to the Prime Minister was, ‘You have got to decide. You have got to decide
whether we are going to offer this third option and this package of an armoured
division on the land’ … eventually … probably as late as the very end of October,
that decision was then taken.”377
957.  Evidence about CENTCOM’s position in documents at the time, including
Adm Boyce’s discussion with Gen Franks on 10 October, Mr Johnson’s advice to
Mr Hoon of 25 October, and Mr Bowen’s report of the Chiefs of Staff discussion on
26 October, indicated that CENTCOM continued to plan on the basis that the UK
might offer a land contribution.
958.  The US Administration wanted UK support and bases for political as well as
military reasons.
959.  It is not clear what specific information caused Adm Boyce and Mr Hoon to
advise in late October 2002 that the US was planning on the basis there would be
no UK land contribution.
Were the post‑conflict implications for the UK, of a significant role on
the ground in an invasion of Iraq, properly addressed?
960.  The MOD advice and Mr Hoon’s minute of 15 October argued that a combat
role would be time limited, and that it would help the UK avoid a significant and
protracted military involvement in Iraq post‑conflict.
376 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, page 36.
377 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, pages 45‑46.
319
Previous page | Contents | Next page