Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Why did the UK offer a divisional headquarters and an armoured
brigade?
900.  The MOD started in spring 2002 from the assumption that if military action
was required, the UK should participate; and that its contribution would be on
a similar scale to the UK contribution to the US‑led operation Desert Storm, the
liberation of Kuwait in 1991. It stressed the importance of making a contribution
which would be seen by the US as commensurate with the UK’s capabilities and
the demands of the campaign.
901.  In addition, from the outset of the planning process, the military leadership
was looking for a discrete UK role in ground operations. This reflected their
concerns about the difficulty of integrating forces from different nations for
ground operations.
902.  That led to the identification of Package 3, which was described as a UK
division, although its size, shape and component parts changed significantly
over time.
903.  From late July onwards, the need to provide cover for a potential strike
by the Fire Brigades Union, which was equivalent to a medium scale operation,
meant that the UK would have been unable to deploy a division of either two or
three brigades within the timescales envisaged by US military planning.
904.  Military planners concentrated on identifying the maximum practicable
contribution the UK would be able to generate within the potential timescales for
US action.
905.  From August until December 2002, UK planning was based on providing a
divisional headquarters and one armoured brigade for operations in northern Iraq.
906.  Asked how the UK’s options had been evaluated, Mr Hoon told the Inquiry that the
assessment of the UK’s contribution had been approached “in terms of what actually
was achievable”; it had been “assumed that we would want to be helpful to the United
States … and, therefore, how would we go about offering as much as was consistent
with all the other pressures that we faced”.350
907.  Mr Hoon added:
“My sense was that, generally speaking, the Prime Minister wanted us to be involved
to the maximum extent that was possible … The Prime Minister was, generally
speaking, anxious to do what the United Kingdom could to help.”351
350 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, page 53.
351 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, page 56.
312
Previous page | Contents | Next page