Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
SPG PAPER, 30 SEPTEMBER 2002
727.  The SPG advised on 30 September that:
A coercive strategy, “Force on Mind”, was “the key instrument of military
power” during a conflict prevention phase.
Overt preparations for the use of military force were strategic elements of
that strategy.
The northern option was seen as strategically fundamental by the UK but
was not seen as operationally fundamental by CENTCOM.
More clarification was needed of the likely tasks for UK land forces and
planning was still constrained by uncertainties about Turkey.
The UN route and the timetable for inspections might not be compatible
with the US timetable for the pursuit of regime change, which might pose
a potential fault line between the US and UK.
728.  A further version of the SPG paper ‘UK Military Strategic Thinking on Iraq’ was
produced on 30 September.291
729.  The paper stated that Ministerial statements highlighted a twin track approach to
achieving the UK’s “End State” for Iraq:
Achieving a “significant change” in the “behaviour and posture” of the current
regime, “with respect to WMD, and other UNSCRs, to prevent conflict”.
If the regime failed “to change its behaviour voluntarily”, then it would “be
compelled to change its posture through the application of force”. If that
resulted in regime change it would be “an unsought, but added benefit”.
730.  That was underpinned by a revised section on the principles for the campaign,
which stated that the UK was “executing a strategic Force on Mind campaign” in which
influence was “targeted against decision makers and their will to fight”. During a conflict
prevention phase, that was “the key instrument of military power”:
The crisis had reached the point where “constant coercive pressure” was
“needed to keep up forward momentum”.
“Overt Force Generation and Force Preparation activities” were “strategic
elements” in applying pressure.
A “clear and unified declaration of intent” from “a wide and solid coalition” would
deliver the most powerful message to Saddam Hussein.
291 Paper [SPG], 30 September 2002, ‘UK Military Strategic Thinking on Iraq’.
283
Previous page | Contents | Next page