Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
Turkey would be wary of any regime change plan that encouraged or created
the conditions in which Kurdish separatism may grow in strength. It wanted
a stable, unitary and secular Iraq.
Iraq would remain a unitary state but many of the structural problems would
remain and: “We should also expect considerable anti‑Western sentiment
among a populace that has experienced ten years of sanctions.”
“A US attempt to create a more equitable long‑term distribution of power in
Iraq would require massive and lengthy commitment. Modern Iraq has been
dominated politically, militarily and socially by the Sunni. To alter that would
entail re‑creation of Iraq’s civil, political and military structures. That would
require a US‑directed transition of power (ie US troops occupying Baghdad)
and support thereafter. Ten years seems a not unrealistic time span for such
a project.”
73.  The paper was sent to Mr Hoon, the Chiefs of Staff, Sir Kevin Tebbit,30
Mr Webb, Lieutenant General Sir Anthony Pigott, Deputy Chief of the Defence
Staff (Commitments), and a small number of other individuals. It was also sent to
Mr John Scarlett, the Chairman of the JIC, the Assessments Staff, Mr Tom Dodd, OD
Sec, Dr Amanda Tanfield, FCO Head of Iraq Section, Middle East Department, and SIS.
74.  The paper was subsequently included in the pack of reading material on Iraq for
Mr Blair, sent to No.10 by Mr Scarlett on 1 August (see Section 3.4).
75.  On 6 March, the Chiefs of Staff were informed that Iraq was “sliding rapidly up the
scale of interest and a degree of strategic planning was essential at some point in the
near future, given the lead times necessary to shape pol/mil thinking effectively”.31
76.  The Chiefs of Staff agreed that Air Chief Marshal Sir Anthony Bagnall, Vice Chief
of the Defence Staff (VCDS), who was chairing the meeting in CDS’s absence, should
“refresh” work on Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) to ensure that it was not left
“too late”.
77.  The process of identifying and agreeing UORs to equip UK forces deployed to Iraq
later in 2002 is addressed in Section 6.3.
78.  Discussions with the Treasury on funding for operations in Iraq are addressed in
Section 13.
CABINET, 7 MARCH 2002
79.  Cabinet on 7 March was assured that no decision to launch military action had
been taken and “any action would be in accordance with international law”.
30 Sir Kevin Tebbit was appointed KCB in the 2002 New Year Honours List.
31 Minutes, 6 March 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
187
Previous page | Contents | Next page