Previous page | Contents | Next page
5  |  Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003
786.  The FCO paper, ‘Iraqi Non-Compliance with UNSCR 1441’, was finalised on
15 March and published on 17 March (see Section 3.8).336
Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s discussions in New York, 16 March 2003
787.  Sir Jeremy Greenstock consulted colleagues in New York on 16 March
to consider whether the Security Council could agree an ultimatum to
Saddam Hussein.
788.  Sir Jeremy reported that he had agreed with his US and Spanish colleagues
to tell the press during the following “late morning” that there was no prospect
of putting the resolution to a vote, and blaming France.
789.  After the Azores Summit on 16 March, Sir David Manning spoke to Sir Jeremy
Greenstock to ask him to phone his Security Council colleagues that evening to
establish whether there had been any change in their positions on the draft resolution.337
790.  Reporting developments in New York on 16 March, Sir Jeremy Greenstock wrote
that, following the conclusion of the Azores Summit, the UK Mission in New York had
spoken to all Security Council colleagues with the message that:
“… there was now a short time left to consider whether the Council could agree at
last on an ultimatum to Saddam which, if he did not fulfil it, would result in serious
consequences. If their respective governments were in a position to engage in such
a discussion, I would need to hear it as early as possible on 17 March. When asked
(as the majority did), I said that I had no (no) instructions as to whether to put the
text … to a vote …”338
791.  Sir Jeremy commented that the French and Russians did not like the message.
Mr Jean-Marc de La Sablière, French Permanent Representative to the UN, had claimed
that the French had moved significantly over the last two days as President Chirac’s
interview would show. The “undecided 6” were “only slightly more positive”.
792.  Sir Jeremy also reported that he had agreed with his US and Spanish counterparts
to tell the press during the “late morning” of 17 March that there was “no prospect of
putting our resolution to the vote, casting heavy blame on the French”. The key elements
of the statement should be:
“(a) the Azores summit had called for a last effort to see if the Council could unite
around an ultimatum;
336 Paper FCO, 15 March 2003, ‘Iraqi Non-Compliance with UNSCR 1141’.
337 Letter Manning to McDonald, 16 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Summit Meeting in the Azores: 16 March’.
338 Telegram 452 UKMIS New York to FCO London, 17 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Developments on 16 March’.
141
Previous page | Contents | Next page