Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
758.  Lord Goldsmith’s view that resolution 1441 authorised the use of force relied on
the conclusion that OP4:
“… constituted a determination in advance that if the particular set of circumstances
specified in it arose, so that Iraq failed to take the final opportunity it had been given,
that would constitute a further material breach.
“The resolution therefore constituted authority for the use of force provided that
such a factual situation had occurred, namely that Iraq had failed to comply with
and co-operate fully in the implementation of the resolution. In that event a Council
discussion would need to take place.
“I had concluded that in any such Council discussion the assessment contemplated
by OP4 was not an assessment of the quality of the breaches, since the Council
had already resolved that any failure on Iraq’s part would constitute a material
breach, but rather an assessment of the situation as a result of those breaches
having occurred … Accordingly, the Council did not need to conclude that breaches
had taken place (though I believe that at the discussion no member of the Security
Council took the view that they had not occurred).
“Nonetheless the authorisation in resolution 678 could not revive unless in fact
breaches had occurred. We needed therefore to be satisfied that this factual
situation existed, and to be in a position if necessary to justify that to a court.
That was why I said … that there would have to be strong factual grounds for
concluding that Iraq had failed to take the final opportunity.”321
759.  Lord Goldsmith wrote:
“As I explained giving my oral evidence, this was an issue on which I wanted the
Prime Minister consciously and deliberately to focus, hence my request for written
confirmation that he had reached this view.”322
Mr Blair’s view
760.  The Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction (‘The Butler Report’)
records it was:
“… told that, in coming to his view that Iraq was in further material breach, the Prime
Minister took account both of the overall intelligence picture and of information from
a wide range of other sources, including especially UNMOVIC information.”323
321 Statement, 4 January 2011, paragraphs 5.6-5.7.
322 Statement, 4 January 2011, paragraph 5.7.
323 Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 385.
136
Previous page | Contents | Next page