Previous page | Contents | Next page
5  |  Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003
“If the answer is yes to the above, can it be assumed that the Attorney will be able
to confirm formally at the time that CDS’s order to implement the planned operation
would be a lawful order (anybody subject to military law commits an offence if he
disobeys any lawful command).
“Comment: Notwithstanding the current uncertainties, when it comes to the crunch,
CDS will need to be assured that his orders are lawful. As the Attorney points out
in his letter, ‘on previous occasions when military action was taken on the basis of
a reasonably arguable case, the degree of public and Parliamentary scrutiny of the
legal issue was nothing like as great as it is today’.”
612.  A minute from Mr Rycroft to Mr Blair described confirmation of the viability of the
overall military plan as the “main purpose of the meeting”.245
613.  The record of the meeting on 11 March stated that Mr Blair had started by
addressing the legal basis for military action. He stated that Lord Goldsmith’s “advice
made it clear that a reasonable case could be made” that resolution 1441 was “capable
of reviving” the authorisation of resolution 678 (1990), “although of course a second
resolution would be preferable”.246
614.  Other points recorded by Mr Rycroft included:
Admiral Boyce said he “would need to put a short paragraph in his directive
to members of the Armed Forces”.
The paragraph “should be cleared with the Attorney General”.
The UK would send the US a positive reply on its request to use Diego Garcia
and RAF Fairford “in a day or two, with the usual conditions attached”.
Mr Hoon and Adm Boyce advised that “once we had given our approval, the US
might give very little notice before the start of the campaign”.
Sir Andrew Turnbull asked whether a legal basis for military action was required
for civil servants, as well as for members of the Armed Forces.
Mr Hoon asked whether the Attorney General’s legal advice was ever disclosed.
Mr Blair asked for a quick study into the precedents for that.
Adm Boyce told the meeting that he was “confident that the battle plan would
work”.
Mr Blair stated that “we must concentrate on averting unintended consequences
of military action. On targeting, we must minimise the risks to civilians.”
615.  A letter, formally confirming the UK’s agreement to US use of Diego Garcia and
RAF Fairford for operations to enforce Iraqi compliance with the obligations on WMD
245 Minute Rycroft to Prime Minister, 11 March 2003, ‘Iraq Military: 1300 Meeting’.
246 Letter Rycroft to McDonald, 11 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Legal and Military Aspects’.
111
Previous page | Contents | Next page