Previous page | Contents | Next page
5  |  Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003
(and the Russians and Chinese) would no doubt be sitting comfortably among the
abstainers …
“My feeling … is that our interests are better served by not putting a draft to a vote
unless we were sure that it had sufficient votes to be adopted … But we should
revisit this issue later – a lot still had to be played out in the Council.”
448.  Mr Blair told Cabinet on 27 February that he would continue to push for
a further Security Council resolution.
449.  Mr Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair’s Director of Communications between May 1997
and August 2003, wrote in his diaries that Mr Blair had had a meeting with Mr Prescott,
the Deputy Prime Minister, and Mr Straw, “at which we went over the distinct possibility
of no second resolution because the majority was not there for it”. Mr Blair “knew that
meant real problems, but he remained determined on this, and convinced it was the right
course”.179
450.  Mr Blair told Cabinet that he would continue to push for a further Security Council
resolution.180 He described the debate in the UK and Parliament as “open”:
“Feelings were running high and the concerns expressed were genuine. But
decisions had to be made. The central arguments remained the threat posed by
weapons of mass destruction in the hands of Iraq; the brutal nature of the Iraqi
regime; and the importance of maintaining the authority of the UN in the international
order. Failure to achieve a further Security Council resolution would reinforce the
hand of the unilateralists in the American Administration.”
A “reasonable case”
Lord Goldsmith’s meeting with No.10 officials, 27 February 2003
451.  When Lord Goldsmith met No.10 officials on 27 February he advised that
the safest legal course would be to secure a further Security Council resolution.
452.  Lord Goldsmith told them, however, that he had reached the view that a
“reasonable case” could be made that resolution 1441 was capable of reviving
the authorisation to use force in resolution 678 (1990) without a further resolution,
if there were strong factual grounds for concluding that Iraq had failed to take the
final opportunity offered by resolution 1441.
453.  Lord Goldsmith advised that, to avoid undermining the case for reliance on
resolution 1441, it would be important to avoid giving any impression that the UK
believed a second resolution was legally required.
179 Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
180 Cabinet Conclusions, 27 February 2003.
81
Previous page | Contents | Next page