Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.2  |  Reconstruction: July 2004 to July 2009
situation is benign will do two things: first, reward good behaviour and encourage
further progress … and secondly, benefit the whole of the country …
“I am not responsible for economic regeneration, and I do not intend to become
a bore about it – so I mention it now – once, and once only. But since I am not
responsible, I cannot be made accountable for the failures of others.”105
185.  Mr Blair visited Baghdad on 21 December.106
186.  Mr Chaplin’s briefing for Mr Blair described an Iraqi Government that was
struggling to maintain supplies of power and fuel as the insurgency took hold, and that
had abandoned hope of visible progress on reconstruction before the elections.107
187.  During his visit, Mr Blair asked Gen Riley for advice on “big-ticket” items that might
make a difference to the economy and essential services of southern Iraq.108
188.  Mr Quarrey’s report on the visit recorded that “Iraqiisation and political outreach
were key themes”.109 Mr Blair remained “very concerned about the slow pace of
reconstruction spending, especially in the South” and about the funding available for
Iraqiisation, and wanted the UK to make a major effort to secure greater funding for
both, in particular from the US. A copy of the report was sent to Mr Benn’s Principal
Private Secretary.
189.  Gen Riley responded to Mr Blair’s request for big-ticket projects on 3 January
2005, in his weekly report to Gen Walker.110 He proposed that, at a minimum, the UK
should aim to build a 200 megawatt (MW) gas turbine plant in the South at a cost of up
to US$100m. USAID estimated that up to four additional power stations needed to be
constructed in Iraq each year to 2020, but only one was currently planned in the South,
which would be funded by Japan. A new power plant would be a visible contribution
to the South and to Iraq, would boost long-term investment and would provide a more
reliable power supply to the oil sector, essential services and Iraqi citizens.
190.  The MOD sent Gen Riley’s report to No.10 on 4 January.111 It was not included in
Mr Quarrey’s weekly round-up on Iraq for Mr Blair (which issued on 7 January), and the
Inquiry has seen no evidence that the report was passed to Mr Blair.112
191.  Gen Riley’s proposal was addressed in a DFID review of infrastructure
requirements in the South the following month.
105  Report Riley, 20 December 2004, ‘GOC MND(SE) – southern Iraq Update – 20 December 04’.
106  BBC News, 21 December 2004, Blair’s statement in Baghdad.
107  Telegram 494 Baghdad to FCO London, 21 December 2004, ‘Prime Minister’s Visit to Iraq,
21 December: Scenesetter’.
108  Report Riley, 3 January 2005, ‘GOC MND(SE) – southern Iraq Update – 3 January 2005’.
109  Letter Quarrey to Owen, 23 December 2004, ‘Prime Minister’s Visit to Iraq: Follow-up’.
110  Report Riley, 3 January 2005, ‘GOC MND(SE) – southern Iraq Update – 3 January 2005’.
111 Letter Naworynsky to Quarrey, 4 January 2005, ‘Iraq: Update’ attaching Report Riley, 3 January 2005,
‘GOC MND(SE) – southern Iraq Update – 3 January 2005’.
112  Minute Quarrey to Prime Minister, 7 January 2005, ‘Iraq: Weekly Round-up’.
227
Previous page | Contents | Next page