Previous page | Contents | Next page
5  |  Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003
Obtaining Lord Goldsmith’s opinion
Instructions for Lord Goldsmith to advise
97.  On 9 December, after receipt of the Iraqi declaration, the FCO issued a formal
request seeking Lord Goldsmith’s advice on whether a further decision by the
Security Council would be required before force could be used to secure Iraq’s
compliance with its disarmament obligations.
98.  Mr Wood set out the “two broad views” on the interpretation of resolution
1441 and whether a further decision was required by the Security Council to
authorise the use of force.
99.  Mr Straw asked Mr Wood to make clear to Lord Goldsmith that his advice was
not needed “now”.
100.  Several drafts of the instructions for Lord Goldsmith were prepared and circulated
within the FCO.
101.  Mr Wood sought the views of senior FCO officials on 21 November, including Sir
Michael Jay and Mr Iain Macleod, the Legal Counsellor in the UK Permanent Mission to
the UN in New York (UKMIS New York). He also wrote that he planned to give Mr Straw
the opportunity to comment on the draft the following week.24
102.  Ms Cathy Adams, Legal Counsellor to Lord Goldsmith between 2002 and 2005,
informed Lord Goldsmith on 29 November that the letter from Mr Wood had “been in
gestation for a couple of weeks now and I understand the original draft has been subject
to extensive comments from UKMIS New York”.25
103.  Mr Stephen Pattison, Head of FCO UN Department, told the Inquiry that all those
people involved in Mr Ricketts’ core group saw the draft instructions, but very few
officials commented from a sense that it was for the lawyers to sort out, and that officials
should not give the impression of interfering.26
104.  Sir Michael Wood told the Inquiry:
“… I received extensive comments from UKMIS New York, conveyed to me by Iain
Macleod and as I understood it, reflecting Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s views. These
essentially concerned the alternative arguments to which they attached importance,
based in part on the negotiating history of the resolution. As I recall, I incorporated
all or virtually all of UKMIS’s suggestions into my letter …
“I do not recall receiving comments on the draft from other quarters.”27
24 Minute Wood to Ricketts, 21 November 2002, ‘Iraq: SCR 1441: Letter to LSLO’.
25 Minute Adams to Attorney General, 29 November 2002, ‘Iraq’.
26 Public hearing, 31 January 2011, pages 48-49.
27 Statement, 15 March 2011, page 19.
21
Previous page | Contents | Next page