Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
547.  On 10 November, Sir Nigel Sheinwald informed Mr Blair that Dr Kay
expected to report to Congress again in February or March 2004. Dr Kay hoped
to have more evidence of WMD programmes, but expected the basic story to be
unchanged.
548.  During a meeting with Sir Nigel Sheinwald in Baghdad on 8 November, Dr Kay said
that the ISG had uncovered more material since the Interim Report:
evidence of development of a ceramic warhead for CW use in 2001:
details of the movement of suspect items to Syria immediately before the war;
work on the stability of CW precursor agents between July 2002 and January
2003;
laboratory testing of advanced chemical agents; and
an anthrax stimulant production line “up to the outbreak of war”.300
549.  Dr Kay was reported to have criticised Coalition handling of detainees. Many had
been debriefed for tactical information only and there was a severe shortage of trained
interrogators.
550.  Dr Kay envisaged that, by June 2004, the ISG would have about 80 percent of
the picture on Iraqi WMD. At that point, it might be appropriate to reconsider its role. He
did not want it to have an open-ended, diminishing role, or to see it refocused on other
tasks. By June 2004, he would also expect Iraq to perceive the ISG as very intrusive.
551.  As part of his wider report on his visit to Iraq (see Section 9.2), Sir Nigel Sheinwald
told Mr Blair that Dr Kay expected to report to Congress again in February or March
2004.301 Dr Kay hoped to have further specific evidence of WMD programmes, but the
basic story would be unchanged. Sir Nigel had told Dr Kay that, if there was a further
interim report, better handling would be needed: “a proper strategy with the key points
identified in advance so that we were not put on the back foot by leaks”.
552.  Sir Nigel asked Mr Blair whether there was anything else he wanted said to Dr Kay
or the CIA. Mr Blair replied:
“Just keep me informed as to what he’s finding; & surely we must now know what
happened to WMD. What do our pre-war contacts say?”302
553.  Mr Scarlett informed Sir Nigel on 17 November that he had asked the DIS to
review the new material described by Dr Kay in his meeting with Sir Nigel Sheinwald.303
The DIS had concluded, “not for the first time, Kay may have talked up some of the
300  Letter Cannon to Scarlett, 10 November 2003, ‘Iraq: Iraq Survey Group: Sir Nigel Sheinwald’s Meeting
with David Kay’.
301  Minute Sheinwald to Prime Minister, 10 November 2003, ‘Visit to Iraq’.
302  Manuscript comment Blair on Minute Sheinwald to Prime Minister, 10 November 2003, ‘Visit to Iraq’.
303  Minute Scarlett to Sheinwald, 17 November 2003, ‘Lunch with David Kay’.
533
Previous page | Contents | Next page