Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
The effect of the February 2003 dossier had been “almost wholly counter-
productive”, undermining the credibility of the Government’s case for war
and the documents that were part of it.
Ministers had not misled Parliament.
389.  The postscript to the FAC report recorded the continuing absence of conclusive
evidence that Iraq possessed WMD:
“Months after the cessation of the military phase of operations in Iraq, no conclusive
evidence has come to light that the regime did indeed possess weapons of mass
destruction. The question arises, why were these weapons not used, assuming they
existed at all? This is at once one of the most difficult and one of the most important
questions the Government has to answer.”
390.  The FCO sent its initial response to the FAC report in November.191 It deferred its
response to the FAC’s conclusions on the 45 minutes claim and the September dossier
until after the conclusion of the Hutton Inquiry.192 Both responses are addressed later in
this Section.
Mr Blair’s evidence to the Liaison Committee, 8 July 2003
391.  During his evidence on Iraq to the Liaison Committee of the House of Commons
on 8 July, Mr Blair was repeatedly asked about the Government’s position on
Iraq’s WMD.193
392.  In his responses, Mr Blair made a number of points, including:
The House of Commons had not been misled and he stood by the case which
had been made for military action “totally”.
There was “no doubt whatever that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons
of mass destruction”, and that, when the UN inspectors “finally had to leave” in
December 1998, “they made it quite clear that in their view ‘unaccounted for’
meant that he had not revealed them”.
He had “no doubt at all” that the ISG would find “evidence of weapons of mass
destruction programmes”.
The policy of containment “was not working”. Saddam Hussein’s strategy “was
to conceal the programmes, to keep the basic expertise in place and then, the
moment the threat was lifted to go back to reinvigorating the programmes again”.
191  Ninth Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Session 2002-2003, The Decision to go to War in
Iraq, Response of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Cm6062.
192  Ninth Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Session 2002-2003, The Decision to go to War in
Iraq, Further Response of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Cm6123.
193  Liaison Committee of the House of Commons, Session 2002-2003, Oral evidence taken before the
Liaison Committee on Tuesday 8 July 2003, Qs 146-209.
499
Previous page | Contents | Next page