Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
SIS/DIS effort and “seek to harness ISG capabilities to joint operational objectives once
the ISG was up and running”. The “surge effort” should last until the end of July, when
SIS would take stock.
368.  SIS3 reported that co-ordination between UK agencies and units and between
UK bodies and their US counterparts was impressive. The task now was to develop
a coherent and comprehensive strategy and methodology that also encompassed
CENTCOM and the ISG.
369.  Mr Blair informed Cabinet on 19 June that the ISG had started systematic work
on uncovering Iraqi programmes for WMD.178 No further discussion of the issue
was recorded.
370.  Mr Howard sent Mr Bowen a progress report on 20 June.179 It was now clear that
Mr Tenet would exercise strategic oversight of the ISG’s work on WMD and would be
represented in Iraq by Dr Kay. Maj Gen Dayton had been tasked to support Dr Kay.
The ISG would continue to work within the military chain of command to ensure it
received the necessary security, logistics and life support. There was evidence that
CENTCOM was now giving the ISG the support it needed.
371.  Mr Howard reported that, during calls on SIS and the DIS on 19 June, Dr Kay had
stressed the importance he attached to the ISG being an intelligence-led operation and
the need for an accelerated timetable.
372.  Mr Howard also enclosed the first ISG situation report from Brig Deverell,
Maj Gen Dayton’s Deputy, who reported that the main components of the ISG were
now functional and that the first operations would take place later in the week.180
373.  Baroness Symons, Minister of State for the Middle East, explained the ISG’s lines
of accountability to London and Washington in the House of Lords on 16 October:
“… the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) is not part of the Coalition Provisional Authority.
It is part of the United States-led military forces in Iraq and is therefore accountable
to the United States Administration. British personnel seconded to the Survey Group
are under the tactical control of the United States’ commander. They are under
the operational command of and accountable to the United Kingdom Chief of Joint
Operations and thus to Her Majesty’s Government. On reporting, the findings of
the Group are available to the Coalition partners, including our own Intelligence
and Security Committee, which will have access to the full text of the ISG
interim report.”181
178  Cabinet Conclusions, 19 June 2003.
179  Letter Howard to Bowen, 20 June 2003, ‘Iraq: Weapons of Mass Destruction: Iraq Survey Group and
Related Issues: Progress Report’.
180  Report Deverell to CDI, 18 June 2003, ‘Iraq Survey Group Sitrep No.1 18 Jun 03’.
181  House of Lords, Official Report, 16 October 2003, column 1095.
493
Previous page | Contents | Next page