Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
125.  AM Burridge criticised CENTCOM’s handling of SSE operations in his ‘Hauldown
Report’ of 8 May.58 He wrote:
“The scale and complexity of SSE was underestimated by CENTCOM who primarily
focused on sites with WMD connections. They became fixated on the Weapons of
Mass Destruction Master Site List (WMSL) and there was unfounded confidence
that the ‘smoking gun’ would be found during the exploitation of early Priority 1
sites. With the rapid collapse of the regime and the failure to find any evidence
of WMD, there was a realisation that the number of non-WMD sites was far in
excess of capability. These needed rapid exploitation before looting destroyed any
potential evidence. The diversity of agencies … and forces … involved resulted
in a fragmented approach … In addition, reporting mechanisms were developed
well after the start of operations, which resulted in confusion and inability to
track progress.”
126.  AM Burridge also criticised the US decision to embed media in XTF-75. The “delay
in establishing the facts associated with many discoveries” had led to friction in the
command chain.
127.  On 11 May, an article published in The Washington Post described the
replacement of XTF-75 by the ISG as “a milestone in frustration for a major declared
objective of the war”, but recognised that:
“Even the sharpest sceptics do not rule out that the hunt may eventually find
evidence of banned weapons. The most significant unknown is what US
interrogators are learning from senior Iraqi scientists, military industrial managers
and Iraqi government leaders now in custody … Publicly, the Bush Administration
has declined to discuss what the captured Iraqis are saying. In private, US officials
provide conflicting reports, with some hinting at important disclosures.”59
128.  The article attracted wide coverage and prompted sharply contrasting headlines in
the UK:
in The Telegraph: “Americans keep up pressure on banned weapons”;60
in The Guardian: “Weapons taskforce leaves in failure”.61
129.  The work of XTF-75 was summarised in the introduction to the final report of
the ISG, published in September 2004:
“Many sites were inspected but with an aim of discovering WMD, not inspecting
and developing an analytical assessment of the Iraqi programs. Wartime conditions
58  Minute Burridge to CJO, 8 May 2003, ‘NCC Operation TELIC Hauldown Report:
07 Feb 03 – 08 May 03’.
59  The Washington Post, 11 May 2003, Frustrated, US Arms Team to Leave Iraq.
60  The Telegraph, 12 May 2003, Americans keep up pressure on banned weapons.
61  The Guardian, 12 May 2003, Weapons taskforce leaves in failure.
449
Previous page | Contents | Next page