Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
584.  Sir Richard should have alerted the Chairman of the JIC and made sure that
Mr Blair and Mr Straw were informed.
585.  Given the controversy about the failure to find WMD and questions about
whether the intelligence had been presented accurately after the conflict,
Sir Richard Dearlove should have ensured that Ministers were aware of the
position when he informed the Intelligence and Security Committee that the
intelligence had been withdrawn.
Withdrawal of two other streams of SIS reporting
586.  By the middle of 2004, serious doubts had emerged about two further
streams of reporting which had informed pre-conflict assessments on:
the production and possession of stocks of chemical and
biological agents;
the weaponisation and deployment of those agents;
Iraq’s intentions to use chemical and biological weapons; and
Iraq’s strategy of concealment and deception.
587.  On 2 June 2004, SIS alerted the FCO and No.10 to concerns about the
reporting from the chain responsible for the “45 minutes” report and a number of
other reports including the one which had informed the 27 November 2002 Update.
588.  The ISC Report published in September 2003 stated that Sir Richard Dearlove
told the Committee that the sourcing for the SIS report of 30 August (the source for
the reference in the September dossier to chemical and biological weapons being
deployable within 45 minutes of an order to use them), was “reliable”:
“The senior military officer named and quoted in the report was in a position to
comment on the deployment of chemical and biological weapons.”226
589.  SIS informed the FCO on 2 June 2004 that it had information casting doubt on the
reliability of information from a sourcing chain which had provided intelligence before the
conflict on Iraq’s intentions and ability to use chemical or biological weapons.227
226  Intelligence and Security Committee, Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and
Assessments, September 2003, Cm5972, paragraph 51.
227  Minute SIS to Kidd, 2 June 2004, ‘Butler Review: Sourcing of 45 Minute Report’ attaching SIS Paper,
2 June 2004, ‘Speaking Note for C to Lord Butler […]’.
392
Previous page | Contents | Next page