The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
584.
Sir Richard
should have alerted the Chairman of the JIC and made sure
that
Mr Blair
and Mr Straw were informed.
585.
Given the
controversy about the failure to find WMD and questions
about
whether the
intelligence had been presented accurately after the
conflict,
Sir Richard
Dearlove should have ensured that Ministers were aware of
the
position
when he informed the Intelligence and Security Committee that
the
intelligence
had been withdrawn.
586.
By the
middle of 2004, serious doubts had emerged about two
further
streams of
reporting which had informed pre-conflict assessments
on:
•
the
production and possession of stocks of chemical and
biological agents;
•
the
weaponisation and deployment of those agents;
•
Iraq’s
intentions to use chemical and biological weapons; and
•
Iraq’s
strategy of concealment and deception.
587.
On 2 June
2004, SIS alerted the FCO and No.10 to concerns about
the
reporting
from the chain responsible for the “45 minutes” report and a number
of
other
reports including the one which had informed the
27 November 2002 Update.
588.
The ISC Report
published in September 2003 stated that Sir Richard
Dearlove
told the
Committee that the sourcing for the SIS report of 30 August (the
source for
the
reference in the September dossier to chemical and biological
weapons being
deployable
within 45 minutes of an order to use them), was
“reliable”:
“The senior
military officer named and quoted in the report was in a position
to
comment on
the deployment of chemical and biological weapons.”226
589.
SIS informed
the FCO on 2 June 2004 that it had information casting doubt on
the
reliability
of information from a sourcing chain which had provided
intelligence before the
conflict on
Iraq’s intentions and ability to use chemical or biological
weapons.227
226
Intelligence
and Security Committee, Iraqi
Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and
Assessments,
September 2003, Cm5972, paragraph 51.
227
Minute SIS
to Kidd, 2 June 2004, ‘Butler Review: Sourcing of 45 Minute Report’
attaching SIS Paper,
2 June
2004, ‘Speaking Note for C to Lord Butler […]’.
392