The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
497.
Reflecting
concerns about source protection, the report was given a very
limited
distribution
to named senior officials.
498.
The report did
not make clear that SIS was not itself in contact with the
source
whom it
considered had direct access to Iraq’s programmes.
499.
The detail of
the reporting and Sir Richard Dearlove’s description of it in
a
telephone
call to Mr Scarlett on 11 September are set out in Section
4.2.
500.
Sir Richard
Dearlove briefed Mr Blair on the reporting on 12
September,
when he had:
“…
underlined … the potential importance of the new source and what
SIS
understood
his access to be; but also said that the case was developmental
and
that the
source remained unproven.”185
501.
SIS4 suggested
that Mr Blair had already known about the intelligence
before
the meeting
between Mr Blair and Sir Richard Dearlove on 12 September, and
that he
wanted to
see the product.186
502.
Sir Richard
Dearlove told the Inquiry that “it would have been very rare” for
him to
have talked
to Ministers or Mr Blair “about our source
base”.187
503.
Asked about
Mr Blair’s reaction, Sir Richard told the Inquiry that Sir
David Manning
had asked
him to give Mr Blair a briefing “which would give him
[Mr Blair] more of a
flavour for
what was actually going on on the ground”.188
Mr Blair
“had an appetite for
that sort
of briefing which was a pretty rare event”, and had had a “fair
amount of general
discussion”
with SIS9 “about the difficulties and problems we were
facing”.
504.
Asked whether
he had been precipitate in going to Ministers with the report
so
quickly,
Sir Richard replied:
“I think in
the circumstances, I don’t agree … because if you issue a report
like that
in the
middle of a crisis, you’re going to get a phone call from a
Ministerial office
within a
short period of time.”189
505.
Sir Richard
also stated that in the circumstances it would have been
“impossible”
not to
issue the report; SIS could not “sit on something as potentially
important”
185
Review of
Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The
Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph
578.
186
Private
hearing, Part 1, page 58.
187
Private
hearing, 16 June 2010, page 53.
188
Private
hearing, 13 July 2010, page 33.
189
Private
hearing, 13 July 2010, pages 34-35.
190
Private
hearing, 13 July 2010, page 35.
380