Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.3  |  Iraq WMD assessments, October 2002 to March 2003
219.  Sir David Manning visited Washington on 29 January for talks with Dr Rice (see
Section 3.6).91 He was accompanied by Sir Richard Dearlove. Sir David reported
that Sir Richard Dearlove had “briefed in detail on our intelligence” which the US
Administration “clearly find very impressive”.
220.  Mr Scarlett assured Sir David Manning on 30 January that the intelligence
reporting was “consistent and convincing”, and there was no evidence that
Saddam Hussein was considering the renunciation of WMD.
221.  Mr Scarlett also highlighted the need for the Government to take seriously
Iraq’s options for using chemical and biological weapons and missiles.
222.  In addition to the JIC Assessment of 29 January, Mr Scarlett sent
Sir David Manning his “personal observations on the overall intelligence picture”,
which addressed Saddam Hussein’s mindset and likely actions.92
223.  Mr Scarlett wrote:
“Our intelligence reporting has been consistent and convincing. I have not seen a
single reference to Saddam even considering the renunciation of WMD to save his
regime (and probably his own life).”
224.  Addressing WMD and inspections, Mr Scarlett wrote that Saddam Hussein had
“followed essentially the same strategy and tactics as during the 1990s”. He had
“probably … considered making a ‘partial’ declaration of WMD holdings”, but “even that
has proved too difficult, at least so far”. Mr Scarlett suggested that would be “an obvious
tactic to deploy at the very last minute” but, in his view, a “genuinely full and open
renunciation” was:
“… simply too dangerous. It would remove the one weapon of last resort with which
Saddam can threaten his population and neighbours and send a signal of weakness
to both with possibly unmanageable consequences (for him). Given the decision
not to come clean, a ‘partial’ admission (for example in the 7 December declaration)
would have been a big risk. The chance of opening up lines of investigation to
what was still being concealed would have been too great. Better to submit a flat
denial leaving no loose ends. From Saddam’s point of view, that was probably the
right decision.”
225.  Mr Scarlett added that the Iraq position had:
“… certainly made it more difficult to find concrete proof of his WMD and leaves him
the continuing options of concealment and delay.
91  Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 30 January 2003, ‘Talks with Condi Rice in Washington on
29 January’.
92  Minute Scarlett to Manning, 30 January 2003, ‘Iraq: JIC Assessment and Personal Observations’.
335
Previous page | Contents | Next page