Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.3  |  Iraq WMD assessments, October 2002 to March 2003
JIC Current Intelligence Group Assessment, 28 October 2002:
‘Global Chemical and Biological Weapons Survey’
45.  A global survey of chemical and biological weapons on 28 October addressed
the practicalities of producing chemical and biological weapons and how they
might be used.
46.  It stated that intelligence indicated that Iraq continued to produce chemical
agent. It assessed that Iraq was producing chemical and biological agents and
that the agents could be weaponised; it did not say that Iraq was doing so.
47.  At the request of the MOD, the JIC issued a Current Intelligence Group (CIG)
global survey of chemical and biological weapons on 28 October.14 It provided a general
assessment of the practicalities involved in producing and using chemical and biological
agents, and an assessment of the capabilities of several countries, including Iraq. It
highlighted the relative ease with which many chemical and biological agents could be
produced and disseminated, and the impact of their use.
48.  The Key Judgements stated:
There are few significant technical problems in the production or dissemination
of many chemical warfare (CW) and biological warfare (BW) agents.
Ballistic missiles and most conventional munitions, such as artillery shells,
rockets and aerial bombs can be modified to deliver agent. It can also be
sprayed from land or marine platforms and a variety of aerial systems.
BW agents are less suitable for some battlefield roles than CW because they
generally act more slowly. CBW could play an increasing role in military thinking,
especially asymmetrically. The use of even small quantities of CW could help
redress conventional superiority on the battlefield. BW agents have the potential
for covert, deniable delivery which is particularly suited to terrorist-type attacks
and asymmetric warfare.
The potential for the proliferation of CBW is increasing. Arms control treaties and
export regimes hinder, but cannot stop the trends.
There is a growing risk of secondary proliferation [of technical knowledge
and experience as well as equipment and hardware] between countries of
concern. […]
States are increasingly using sophisticated denial, deception and concealment
methods, including the use of dual-use and/or underground facilities, to hide
their activities.”
14  CIG Assessment, 28 October 2002, ‘Global Chemical and Biological Weapons Survey’.
299
Previous page | Contents | Next page