Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.2  |  Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
746.  The CIG judged that the Ababil-100, a 150km range solid propellant missile, was
likely to become operational within two years, and intelligence indicated that Iraq had
plans to extend its range.
747.  The JIC Assessment of 9 September 2002 stated that Iraq was developing
Al Samoud and Ababil-100 missiles with a range of “150km plus”, which were being
deployed to military units and could have “an emergency operational capability with
conventional warheads”, not a capability to deliver chemical or biological warheads.416
748.  Mr Blair’s statement that he believed that the “assessed intelligence has
established beyond doubt” that “Saddam has continued to produce chemical
and biological weapons” and that “he continues in his efforts to develop nuclear
weapons”, went further than the assessments of the JIC.
749.  The JIC should have advised Mr Blair that he could not make that
statement.
750.  Asked about Mr Blair’s statement that he believed “the assessed intelligence has
established beyond doubt” that Iraq has continued to produce chemical and biological
weapons, continues in its efforts to develop nuclear weapons, and had been able to
extend the range of its ballistic missile programme, Sir John Scarlett told the Inquiry
that he:
“… saw the … Foreword as something quite separate from the text of the dossier
itself. The text of the dossier itself I was clearly responsible for drafting.
“The Foreword was overtly a political statement signed by the Prime Minister. So it
was his wording and his comments that were there throughout, although I did make
one or two, three maybe, small changes on the text of the Foreword, basically to
correct one or two small points, which I thought were – or actually add at one point
in particular about who received intelligence assessments in the first paragraph, and
also to bring it into line with the text of the dossier itself.
“There was a particular point on concealment. I didn’t see it as something that I
would change. That’s all I can recall now … it is quite difficult now to reconstruct the
actual sort of process of how this happened several years later … [B]ut my memory
at the time quite clearly was this was something which was the Prime Minister’s and
it was going out under his signature. So it was different from the attention that I paid
to the wording of the dossier.”417
416  JIC Assessment, 9 September 2002, ‘Iraqi Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons –
Possible Scenarios’.
417  Public hearing, 8 December 2009, pages 62-63.
259
Previous page | Contents | Next page