4.2 |
Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
509.
Mr Owen
agreed with Mr Sedwill. He suggested that the Foreword
needed:
“… to refer
to the UN in the first sentences. This is after all, about the
authority
of the UN
and international law. This is the only way we can win the
argument
in Parliament
and elsewhere …”254
510.
Mr Straw
suggested that the Foreword for the dossier “should be in a
narrative
form” by
Mr Blair, and that it needed “a killer” paragraph on “Saddam’s
defiance of the
UN, only
annexation of another member state and unprecedented use of
WMD”.255
511.
Writing before
the decision had been taken that Mr Blair would sign the
Foreword
or the text
had been drafted, Mr Bowen wrote:
“I take it
as read that the Foreword is a political piece, signed by the Prime
Minister
or another
Minister. In that text it would be useful to make the point that
what follows
is the work
of officials drawing on sensitive intelligence material. The
Foreword
can be as
loaded as we like in terms of the political message (provided it
is
consistent
with the dossier itself), whereas the text itself should be the
judgement
512.
The minute was
copied to Mr Campbell, Mr Powell and Sir David
Manning.
513.
Mr Campbell
produced a draft Foreword for Mr Blair on 16
September.257
The draft began:
“The
document published today is the work of the Joint Intelligence
Committee …”
514.
Referring to
the intelligence which had “formed the judgements” in the
dossier,
the draft
stated:
“I and
other Ministers have been briefed in detail on the sources, and are
satisfied
as to their
authority, and the authority of the information they have
disclosed.
“What I
believe they established beyond doubt is that Saddam has continued
to
produce
chemical and biological weapons that he continues in his efforts to
develop
nuclear
weapons, and to extend the range of his ballistic missile
programme.
“This
picture … has become more not less worrying. Faced with the picture
put
before me
on seeing a succession of JIC papers on the subject, as Prime
Minister
I have
a choice: do I ignore this evidence or do I act to address the
threat?
254
Email Owen
to Sedwill, 11 September 2002, ‘Dossier 10/9 Version –
Comments’.
255
Email
Sedwill to Gray, 11 September 2002, ‘Iraq Dossier: 10/9 Version –
Foreign Secretary’s
Comments’.
256
Minute
Bowen to Scarlett, 11 September 2002, ‘The Iraq
Dossier’.
257
Email
Hatfield to Blackshaw, 16 September 2002, ‘Draft’ attaching
Document, [undated], ‘Dossier
Foreword by
TB’.
209