Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The facts in the dossier “as a whole” presented a picture of a regime which
was “so opposed to international norms of behaviour that it must be confronted
effectively now”.
162.  Mr Rycroft suggested that Mr McKane should develop the draft.71
163.  Sir David Manning wrote: “Yes. Let’s see what the response is.”72
164.  In his statement for the Inquiry, Mr McKane wrote that Mr Blair:
“… had decided the dossier should be ready for publication within weeks, in
order to explain publicly why effective action had to be taken to counter the threat
posed by Iraq. This is brought out in the draft ‘capping piece’ which I sent to
Matthew Rycroft …”73
165.  Asked about the origins of the capping note, Mr McKane told the Inquiry that it
“followed an exchange with either Sir David Manning or Matthew Rycroft in which we
agreed that the draft needed something … which would encapsulate the main points”.74
166.  Mr McKane subsequently stated:
“I suppose what I was doing was trying to answer the question: why should we take
action now? So it is related to the shift in approach that was marked by the meeting
on 23 July and the greater sense of pace and urgency that was injected thereafter.”75
167.  Following the Sedgefield press conference, Dr Michael Williams, Mr Straw’s
Special Adviser, wrote to Mr Straw reporting that the Director of the International Institute
for Strategic Studies (IISS) had informed him that it would be publishing its dossier
on the threat posed by Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction and past
practices of deception in relation to UN inspections.76 Dr Williams thought that it would
“be helpful in moving towards a more informed debate about Iraq which is long overdue”.
168.  Commenting on the draft UK dossier, Dr Williams wrote that he shared many
of Mr John Williams’ views:
“The text I’ve seen is not significantly different from one I saw in late Spring.
“It is certainly not a ‘killer’ dossier. The material is often poorly presented
and would benefit from professional editing to make it a sharper assessment.
71  Manuscript comment Rycroft to Manning, 3 September 2002, on Minute McKane to Rycroft,
2 September 2002, ‘Iraq’.
72  Manuscript comment Manning to Rycroft, 3 September 2002, on Minute McKane to Rycroft,
2 September 2002, ‘Iraq’.
73  Statement, 8 December 2010, page 5.
74  Public hearing, 19 January 2011, page 83.
75  Public hearing, 19 January 2011, page 84.
76  Minute Williams [Michael] to Straw, 3 September 2002, ‘Iraq Publication’.
144
Previous page | Contents | Next page