Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.2  |  Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
Introduction and key findings
1.  This Section addresses:
the assessment between late July and late September 2002 of Iraq’s capabilities
and intentions to develop, produce and use chemical, biological and nuclear
weapons and ballistic missiles;
the production of the Government dossier Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction.
The Assessment of the British Government, which was published on
24 September; and
Mr Blair’s statement to the House of Commons that day.
2.  A significant number of the documents relevant to the events considered in this
Section are already in the public domain, including:
documents published by the Hutton Inquiry, including the four drafts of the
dossier produced in September 2002; and
documents released in response to FOI requests.
3.  The Inquiry has examined most of the original, unredacted, versions of these
documents and, in some cases, is adding further information to that already in the public
domain. In a small number of cases, however, primarily emails given to the Hutton
Inquiry, the Government has been unable to provide copies of the original documents.
4.  The roles and responsibilities of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) and the
Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) are addressed in Section 2.
5.  The development of UK strategy during the period addressed in this Section
is addressed in Sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5.
6.  The military planning for a campaign in which chemical and biological weapons
could be used, and in particular the arrangements to provide protection for UK forces,
are addressed in Section 6.1 to 6.3.
Key findings
The urgency and certainty with which the Government stated that Iraq was a threat
which had to be dealt with fuelled the demand for publication of the dossier and led
to Mr Blair’s decision to publish it in September, separate from any decision on the
way ahead.
The dossier was designed to “make the case” and secure Parliamentary and public
support for the Government’s position that action was urgently required to secure
Iraq’s disarmament.
The JIC accepted ownership of the dossier and agreed its content. There is no
evidence that intelligence was improperly included in the dossier or that No.10
improperly influenced the text.
115
Previous page | Contents | Next page