4.2 |
Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
1.
This Section
addresses:
•
the
assessment between late July and late September 2002 of Iraq’s
capabilities
and
intentions to develop, produce and use chemical, biological and
nuclear
weapons and
ballistic missiles;
•
the
production of the Government dossier Iraq’s
Weapons of Mass Destruction.
The Assessment
of the British Government, which was
published on
24 September;
and
•
Mr Blair’s
statement to the House of Commons that day.
2.
A significant
number of the documents relevant to the events considered in
this
Section are
already in the public domain, including:
•
documents
published by the Hutton Inquiry, including the four drafts of
the
dossier
produced in September 2002; and
•
documents
released in response to FOI requests.
3.
The Inquiry
has examined most of the original, unredacted, versions of
these
documents
and, in some cases, is adding further information to that already
in the public
domain. In
a small number of cases, however, primarily emails given to the
Hutton
Inquiry,
the Government has been unable to provide copies of the original
documents.
4.
The roles and
responsibilities of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) and
the
Secret
Intelligence Service (SIS) are addressed in Section 2.
5.
The
development of UK strategy during the period addressed in this
Section
is addressed
in Sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5.
6.
The military
planning for a campaign in which chemical and biological
weapons
could be
used, and in particular the arrangements to provide protection for
UK forces,
are
addressed in Section 6.1 to 6.3.
•
The urgency
and certainty with which the Government stated that Iraq was a
threat
which had
to be dealt with fuelled the demand for publication of the dossier
and led
to
Mr Blair’s decision to publish it in September, separate from
any decision on the
way ahead.
•
The dossier
was designed to “make the case” and secure Parliamentary and
public
support for
the Government’s position that action was urgently required to
secure
Iraq’s
disarmament.
•
The JIC
accepted ownership of the dossier and agreed its content. There is
no
evidence
that intelligence was improperly included in the dossier or that
No.10
improperly
influenced the text.
115