Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.1  |  Iraq WMD assessments, pre-July 2002
548.  When he saw the draft paper on WMD countries of concern on 8 March,
Mr Straw commented:
“Good, but should not Iraq be first and also have more text? The paper has
to show why there is an exceptional threat from Iraq. It does not quite do
this yet.”235
549.  On 18 March, Mr Straw decided that a paper on Iraq should be issued before
one addressing other countries of concern.
550.  On 22 March, Mr Straw was advised that the evidence would not convince
public opinion that there was an imminent threat from Iraq.
551.  Publication was postponed. No.10 decided that the Cabinet Office Overseas
and Defence Secretariat should co-ordinate the production of a “public dossier”
on Iraq, and that Mr Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair’s Director of Communications and
Strategy, should “retain the lead role on the timing/form of its release”.
552.  The statements prepared for, and used by, the UK Government in public,
from late 2001 onwards, about Iraq’s proscribed activities and the potential
threat they posed were understandably written in more direct and less nuanced
language than the JIC Assessments on which they drew.
553.  The question is whether, in doing so, they conveyed more certainty and
knowledge than was justified, or created tests it would be impossible for Iraq to
meet. That is of particular concern in relation to the evidence in this Section on
two key issues.
554.  First, the estimates of the weapons and material related to Iraq’s chemical
and biological warfare programmes for which UNSCOM had been unable to
account were based on extrapolations from UNSCOM records. Officials explicitly
advised that it was “inherently difficult to arrive at precise figures”. In addition, it
was acknowledged that neither UNSCOM nor the UK could be certain about either
exactly what had existed or what Iraq had already destroyed.
555.  The revised estimates announced by Mr Straw on 2 May were increasingly
presented in Government statements as the benchmark against which Iraq should
be judged.
556.  Second, the expert MOD examination of issues in late March 2002 exposed
the difficulties Iraq would have to overcome before it could acquire a nuclear
weapon. That included the difficulty of acquiring suitable fissile material from the
“black market”.
235  Minute McDonald to Ricketts, 11 March 2002, ‘Iraq’.
111
Previous page | Contents | Next page