Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
warfare capabilities, was determined to preserve and if possible enhance its
capabilities, including at some point in the future a nuclear capability, and was
pursuing an active and successful policy of deception and concealment. That, and
the JIC Assessments of whether and in what circumstances Iraq might use those
capabilities, is addressed in Section 4.
945.  Iraq’s capability was judged to be limited and its chemical and biological
weapons did not pose a direct or imminent threat to the UK. Iraq was judged to
be most likely to use its weapons as a last resort in response to a military attack
which threatened the survival of the regime.
946.  Mr Blair’s statements on the risk of terrorists willing and able to use
weapons of mass destruction being able to obtain them from Iraq are addressed
in Section 7.
947.  Saddam Hussein’s regime had the potential to proliferate material and
know-how to terrorist groups, but it was not judged likely to do so.
948.  Mr Blair’s and Mr Straw’s statements claimed that the UK Government was
acting on behalf of the international community “to uphold the authority of the
Security Council”.
949.  The Charter of the United Nations vests responsibility for the maintenance
of peace and security in the Security Council.
950.  On 18 March, the majority of the Security Council’s members were not
persuaded that the inspections process, and the diplomatic efforts surrounding
it, had reached the end of the road. They did not agree that the time had come
to terminate inspections and resort to force.
951.  In the absence of a majority in the Security Council in support of military
action at that point, the UK was undermining the authority of the Security Council.
DEBATE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS, 18 MARCH 2003
952.  Lord Williams of Mostyn set out the Government’s position in the House of Lords,
stating: “Ours is a stark choice: we stand our troops down and turn back or we hold firm
to the course that we have set. We must hold firm.”333
953.  Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) agreed that “to turn about now would be to
court incalculable future danger in the face of the greater emerging threat to our
future security”.334
954.  Baroness Williams (Liberal Democrat), referring to Mr Cook’s resignation statement
on 17 March, commented that there was “more than one set of opinions about how
333  House of Lords, Official Report, 18 March 2003, columns 138-142.
334  House of Lords, Official Report, 18 March 2003, column 146.
570
Previous page | Contents | Next page