Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
774.  Asked if France would have been prepared to vote for a resolution authorising
force if the process had been pursued to the point where Dr Blix might have reported
that the process was exhausted, Mr Blair replied that in his judgement:
“… it was very, very clear … the French, the Germans and the Russians had
decided they weren’t going to be in favour of this and there was a straightforward
division … I don’t think it would have mattered how much time we had taken, they
weren’t going to agree that force should be used.”275
775.  Mr Blair added that, if the inspectors had uncovered something “absolutely
dramatic”, that “might have made a difference” to France’s position, but “there was by
then a political divide on this, of a pretty fundamental nature”.
776.  Mr Blair told the Inquiry:
“We never misrepresented the French view. The French view was perfectly clear.
It wasn’t that they were against any second resolution. They would perfectly happily
have agreed a second resolution provided it meant a third resolution and they would
have agreed a third resolution provided it meant a fourth one.
“What they were not prepared to do in any set of circumstances, never mind ce soir,
was that they were not prepared to agree to a resolution with an ultimatum.”276
777.  Mr Blair added that the UK was “caught” in a situation where the US was “quite
rightly” saying that what France was “prepared to agree” was “basically a rerun of 1441
except possibly weaker”; and that was “useless”.
778.  Mr Blair stated that President Chirac’s view was that inspections were working and
that was the route to deal with Saddam Hussein; “we should not deal with him by force,
whatever the circumstances”. President Chirac’s “point was not time”, “His point was if
it has an ultimatum in it, I don’t want it.”277 Mr Blair added: “Anything with an ultimatum,
they were going to veto.”
The decision to take military action
779.  On the morning of Monday 17 March, preparations for Cabinet later that day
and Parliamentary debates the following day were put in place.
780.  Mr Straw wrote to Parliamentary colleagues drawing their attention to
the documents being published, the statements issued at the Azores Summit
the previous day, and an FCO paper assessing Iraq’s progress in meeting the
provisions of resolution 1441.
275  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, pages 125-126.
276  Public hearing, 21 January 2011, page 100.
277  Public hearing, 21 January 2011, pages 100-101.
537
Previous page | Contents | Next page