Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
meant it would be difficult to increase employment significantly by the end of the
year, but donors and the CPA should:
a. maximise use of local labour, as already stipulated in US reconstruction
contracts; DFID would aim to do the same;
b. provide finance for small business;
c. fund employment creation schemes; USAID programmes should be
targeted at “higher risk” locations; DFID would consider options for the
south with CPA (South) in February;
d. ensure pension payments were up to date.
Disruption to the supply of cheap (subsidised) fuel.
Electricity supply. Demand was estimated at 5,700MW and rising rapidly, supply
at about 4,000MW. It was likely the US would not meet its target of 6,000MW
by June 2004. Outside the South there was little the UK could do to help. In
the South, the Essential Services Plan would help to ensure demand was met.
The priority should be to implement US-funded programmes and encourage
Japanese investment in the power sector, recognising that little would be
delivered by the middle of 2004. DFID would consider in February whether
further UK investment was needed in the South.
905.  The paper proposed that, in the run-up to transition, the UK should give priority
to improving Iraqi economic policy making, preparing Iraqi ministries for the decisions
they would need to make on subsidies and state-owned enterprises, and determining
the structure that would succeed the CPA. It warned that the UK should be prepared for
three or four months of Iraqi Government inaction after 30 June, which might produce
rising levels of discontent.
906.  The paper was endorsed by the ISG.521
DFID’s Interim Country Assistance Plan
907.  DFID circulated a first draft of its Interim Country Assistance Plan (I-CAP) for
Iraq to members of ISOG for comment on 19 December 2003.522
908.  A “final draft” was discussed at the 20 January 2004 meeting of ISOG, before
being submitted to the 22 January meeting of the AHMGIR.523 At the ISOG meeting,
an FCO official expressed concern about the apparent exclusion of Kurdish areas from
DFID’s plans.
909.  ISOG agreed that, on the assumption that the AHMGIR agreed to the publication
of the I-CAP, the FCO and the Cabinet Office would “help sanitise the paper”.
521  Minute Dodd to Sheinwald, 2 February 2004, ‘Iraq Strategy Group’.
522  Letter Drummond to Bowen, 19 December 2004, ‘Iraq: DFID Country Assistance Plan’.
523  Minute Dodd to Buck, 21 January 2004, ‘Iraq: Senior Officials Group’.
156
Previous page | Contents | Next page