Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
“TB said we had reached the point of decision for people. We had been there
before but there really had to be a decision. How many times could there be
a last chance, serious consequences for material breach? He reported that
Kofi [Annan] had said the French and Russians would not rule out force but
would not agree to an ultimatum, which was an odd position. He really hit the
UN buttons post-Saddam, and was trying to force Bush to go further on that.
‘It has to be a UN-authorised government.’ He was also hammering home the
advantages on MEPP, but I wasn’t convinced it would happen.”
“We needed some kind of process story so I suggested to TB they all instruct
their ambassadors at the UN to have one last go, see if the position of the others
had changed.”
“TB was constantly emphasising final appeal, final opportunity.”
“Bush was scathing re the Turks … He was pretty keen to get on with things
now, wanted to pull down the SCR now. He then said he would address the
American people tomorrow – say diplomacy had failed, issue the ultimatum.
He said to TB we should say we were issuing one last set of instructions to UN
ambassadors to have a go at securing agreement.”
“Aznar was really pushing the importance of the transatlantic alliance, but he
was in even more political hot water on this than we were.”235
687.  The ‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’, issued at the Summit, and outlining the
challenge Saddam Hussein posed to the world, stated:
“Iraq’s talented people, rich culture, and tremendous potential had been
hijacked by Saddam Hussein”, whose “brutal regime had reduced” Iraq “to an
international pariah” that oppressed “its citizens, started two wars of aggression
against its neighbours” and still posed “a grave threat to the security of the
region and the world”.
“Saddam’s defiance” of Security Council resolutions demanding disarmament
had “undermined the authority of the UN”. The international community had
“tried to persuade him to disarm and thereby avoid military conflict, most recently
through the unanimous adoption of resolution 1441”. If he refused “even now to
co-operate fully” with the UN, he brought “on himself the serious consequences
foreseen in resolution 1441 and previous resolutions”.
“In these circumstances, we would undertake a solemn obligation to help the
Iraqi people build a new Iraq at peace with itself and its neighbours. The Iraqi
people deserve to be lifted from insecurity and tyranny, and freed to determine
for themselves the future of their country. We envisage a unified Iraq with its
territorial integrity respected. All the Iraqi people – its rich mix … should enjoy
freedom, prosperity, and equality in a united country. We will support the Iraqi
235  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
519
Previous page | Contents | Next page