Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
137.  President Chirac stated:
“… it seems to me that war is something which will break up the world coalition
against terrorism … we mustn’t forget that a very great majority of the world’s
countries and peoples are against this war … France isn’t isolated … So if there
is a war there is indeed a risk of a new upsurge in terrorism.”
138.  The headline in Le Monde the following day was “Quelles que soient les
circonstances, la France votera non”.38
139.  Commenting on the interview the following day, Sir John Holmes wrote that, “Even
if only in response to a question”, President Chirac had gone “out of his way to make his
position categoric”.39 He added:
“The French calculation is presumably that this makes it as hard as possible for
the Russians and Chinese not to follow, and as easy as possible for the swing six
to abstain, as an obvious middle course between the two opposing blocs. The only
glimmer of encouragement that I can see for us is that he may have played this
card too soon, apparently ruling out any flexibility even if the text of a resolution is
amended … We may be able to use this against the French in arguing with others.
I suppose it is possible in theory that … Chirac could change to an abstention.
But this is clutching at straws, such is the limb he has deliberately put himself on.”
140.  Sir John Holmes told the Inquiry that President Chirac had prepared his remarks
and had decided at that stage that he was “fully in opposition to … the invasion of Iraq”.40
141.  Sir John thought President Chirac had been saying: “The text, as we have it at this
moment, is not one we can support and we will vote against it.”41
142.  Sir John stated, “There was genuine ambiguity” about what President Chirac had
meant: “There was scope for interpretation.”42
143.  Sir Jeremy Greenstock also told the Inquiry:
“The fact was that, although the words didn’t surprise us, the fact that Chirac said
it at that time, in that way, was politically aggressive by the French. That was
the point.”43
38  Le Monde, 11 March 2003. [Taken from Le Monde (international), 22 March 2003.]
39  Telegram 124 Paris to FCO London, 11 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Chirac’s TV Interview – France’s Veto’.
40  Public hearing, 29 June 2010, page 40.
41  Public hearing, 29 June 2010, pages 43-44.
42  Public hearing, 29 June 2010, page 49.
43  Private hearing, 26 May 2010, page 35.
425
Previous page | Contents | Next page