Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS IN NEW YORK
86.  Reporting informal consultations in New York on 10 March, Sir Jeremy Greenstock
said that he had drawn the attention of the Security Council to Mr Straw’s statement and
the reference to work on a list of defined tests.26 That had “caused a fair bit of interest”.
87.  Sir Jeremy also reported that, in response to questions, the points made by
Dr Blix included:
40 interviews had been requested and 15 had been conducted “to
UNMOVIC’s modalities”.
The RPV UNMOVIC had discovered was important and should have been
declared. UNMOVIC was examining whether it was proscribed.
52 Al Samoud 2 missiles had been destroyed.
It was difficult for him to assess the regional threat posed by WMD. There were
no confirmed cases of its existence and UNMOVIC had never maintained Iraq
had them. But the clusters document recorded Iraqi deceit; repeated Full, Final
and Complete Disclosures (FFCDs); hide and seek and cheating in the past.
There were a lot of accounting problems.
UNMOVIC was not expressing any low regard for intelligence agencies but no
WMD had been found as a result of tips on location. Part of the reason might be
that intelligence was gathered at levels which did not deal with actual storage.
Experience showed that it was possible that Iraq could have mobile
biological facilities.
88.  Mr Blair failed to secure unqualified support from President Lagos for
his approach.
89.  Mr Blair spoke twice to President Lagos on 10 March in an attempt to find a path
both President Lagos and President Fox could support.
90.  In the first telephone call, before a conversation with Dr Blix, Mr Blair reported
Dr Blix’s response to Sir Jeremy Greenstock on the draft tests.27
91.  In the second conversation, Mr Blair reported progress on the three areas President
Lagos had raised:
Sir Jeremy Greenstock had worked up an agreed text with UNMOVIC identifying
a set of concrete tests on which to judge Iraqi compliance.
Mr Blair thought it “would be possible to find different wording” on the ultimatum
to Iraq.
26  Telegram 403 UKMIS New York to FCO London, 11 March 2003, ‘Iraq: 10 March Council Consultations’.
27  Letter Rycroft to Owen, 10 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Chile, 10 March’.
416
Previous page | Contents | Next page