Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.7  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 1 February to 7 March 2003
548.  Sir David asked:
Were these the “right” tests?
Were there others that could added?
“Should the tests be included explicitly in a second resolution, or should this
take the form of a short text simply stating that Saddam Hussein is in breach
of 1441, while the conditions he must meet by 14 March are set out in an
accompanying statement?”
549.  Sir David asked for advice that day, stating that his letter and accompanying
minute should be held “very tightly”, handled “on a strictly need to know basis” and
the addressees should “keep the papers off main files”.
550.  Sir David Manning spoke to Dr Rice before the EU Council on 17 February.152
551.  In response to Dr Rice’s report that, in a conversation with Dr Blix over the
weekend, Dr Blix had “felt bad that he had given the Iraqis too much in his …
presentation to the Security Council”, Sir David said that Dr Blix had “overdone the
course correction, worried by the reaction to his earlier presentation on 27 January”.
552.  Sir David told Dr Rice that Dr Blix “had hinted” to Mr Straw “that he might be in
the market for an ultimatum” and they discussed his report which would summarise the
outstanding disarmament questions. They also discussed whether the Security Council
should instruct Dr Blix to destroy the Al Samoud missiles. Sir David commented that he
“strongly favoured” that: “Saddam would hate having to do it and might be provoked into
making a mistake.”
553.  Sir David said the UK was thinking about the shape and timing of an ultimatum:
“We did not have nine votes in the Security Council at present, and were very
unlikely to get there by 28 February … we needed time to shift three or four
abstentions … If it became clear that we could win, we could hope the French
would decide to abstain rather than veto. It was going to be a tough sell …
Once the ultimatum was down, and the deadline was clear, the dynamics would
change … We must take more time if we needed it.”
554.  In the subsequent discussion about how to increase the number of votes in favour
of a resolution and whether, if there was a majority, France would abstain rather than
veto, Dr Rice said that would be a “tough fight” in the US Administration about more
time. She thought 8 March, “exactly four months” after the adoption of resolution 1441,
might be better than 14 March as the French wanted. Sir David commented that he “saw
the attraction”, but: “We must take more time if we need it.”
152  Letter Manning to McDonald, 17 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
279
Previous page | Contents | Next page