Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.7  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 1 February to 7 March 2003
on substance would be bound to negate the case for the UK’s involvement
in military action.”
510.  Secretary Powell was reported to have responded that he understood that:
“… but he was not sure that was where President Bush was. He might still be
inclined to ‘go it alone’ for the removal of Saddam and the President believed that
the Prime Minister would commit British troops in any event.”
511.  Mr Straw said that Mr Blair’s “personal loyalty to the President was never in doubt;
but that alone would not answer the question whether there was adequate legal and
political justification for UK military involvement”.
512.  In response to Secretary Powell’s comment that he assumed the demonstration
on 15 February made a second resolution “even more necessary”, Mr Straw replied:
“… yes. If there were nine votes or more in the Security Council for a second
resolution, and this majority was subject to a veto by one only of the P5, I thought
we could carry the day in the Commons and the country but there would have
to be … clear evidence of substantive non-compliance by Iraq of 1441. Without
the latter, we could have no chance. Regime change per se had never been the
objective of HMG’s strategy however desirable it was.”
513.  Mr Straw added that:
“… even with a second resolution (or a majority and a veto but good case) the
political and public order consequences of the early stages of military action on
current plans would be hard to handle: without a very strong case, consistent with
our clear, already stated objectives, they could become unmanageable. Unless we
were very lucky, military action without an effective international consensus could
severely damage US as well as UK interests.”
514.  In a discussion of the timing for a second resolution, Mr Powell said he was still
thinking about tabling a resolution that week but stating that a vote was not being asked
for immediately. Mr Straw pointed out the disadvantages for the UK while Parliament
was in recess, adding that tabling a resolution without any commitment for an early vote
would be seen as a sign of weakness. It might also make it harder to secure the votes
of the elected members of the Council. It might also be seen as ignoring the outcome
of the inspectors’ reports on 28 February.
271
Previous page | Contents | Next page