Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.7  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 1 February to 7 March 2003
364.  Addressing how much, “if any” was left of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction,
Dr Blix stated that UNMOVIC had not found any so far, “only a small number of empty
chemical munitions, which should have been declared and destroyed”. UNMOVIC had
destroyed the “laboratory quantity” of a “mustard gas precursor” that had been found.
Many proscribed weapons and items had not been accounted for, but:
“One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist. However that possibility
is also not excluded. If they exist they must be presented for destruction. If they
do not exist, credible evidence to that effect should be presented.”
365.  Referring to his warning on 27 January that Iraq should not brush aside questions
on significant outstanding issues of substance, including on anthrax, the nerve agent
VX and long range missiles, Dr Blix stated that the fact that Iraq had, in its declaration
of 7 December 2002, “missed the opportunity to provide the fresh material and evidence
needed to respond to the open questions” was “perhaps the most important problem
we are facing”. He added:
“Although I can understand that it may not be easy for Iraq in all cases to provide
the evidence needed, it is not the task of the inspectors to find it. Iraq itself must
squarely tackle this task and avoid belittling the questions.”
366.  Some papers had been provided in Baghdad on 9 February. Dr Blix stated that
“could be indicative of a more active attitude” but there were problems verifying the
quantities of anthrax and two precursors for VX which Iraq had unilaterally destroyed:
“Documentary evidence and testimony by staff who dealt with the items still appears to
be needed.” Iraq’s initiative to identify 83 participants “in the unilateral destruction in the
chemical field” appeared “useful and pertain[ed] to co-operation on substance”. Dr Blix
trusted that Iraq would put together a “similar list of names of persons who participated
in the unilateral destruction of other proscribed items”.
367.  Dr Blix also welcomed the extension of the mandate of an Iraqi commission to
look for any proscribed items and the appointment of a second commission to search
for documents relevant to the elimination of proscribed items and programmes. But they
would “evidently need to work fast and effectively to convince us, and the world, that it is
a serious effort”.
368.  Experts had “concluded unanimously” that the two variants of the Al Samoud 2
missile declared by Iraq were capable of exceeding the range of 150km. Those, and
any of the 380 SA-2 (Volga) engines which had been imported in contravention of
resolution 687 (1991) and converted for use in the Al Samoud missile system, were
proscribed. The casting chambers for missile motors were also proscribed. Clarifications
were needed before decisions could be made on the capabilities of the Al Fatah missile
and the al-Rafah engine test stand.
245
Previous page | Contents | Next page