Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
171.  Mr Annan called for unity and warned of the consequences of the use of
force without the legitimacy provided by the Security Council.
172.  In a speech in Williamsburg, Virginia, on 8 February 2003, Mr Annan addressed
the “anxiety, in this country and throughout the world about the prospect of war in Iraq”.42
He stated:
The UN had been founded “to save succeeding generations from the scourge
of war”, which “We all – and, first and foremost, the leaders of Iraq itself – have
a duty to prevent it if we possibly can.”
But “there would be times when force must be met with force”; and there were
provisions in the UN Charter “to enable the world community to unite against
aggression and defeat it”.
Iraq had “not yet satisfied the Security Council that it has fully disarmed itself
of weapons of mass destruction”.
That was “an issue not for any State alone, but for the international community
as a whole. When States decide to use force, not in self-defence but to deal with
broader threats to international peace and security, there is no substitute for the
unique legitimacy provided by the United Nations Security Council. States and
peoples around the world attach fundamental importance to such legitimacy,
and to the international rule of law.”
It was “vitally important” that the whole international community acted in a
“united way – so as to achieve greater security by strengthening, and not
weakening or undermining, the multilateral treaties on disarmament and non-
proliferation. Only a collective, multilateral approach can effectively curb the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and make the world a safer place.”
The UN had “the duty to exhaust all the possibilities of peaceful settlement,
before resorting to the use of force”.
It was “thanks in large part to the firm challenge issued by President Bush – and
the pressure that followed it – that the inspectors are back in Iraq”.
There was “total unanimity” that “Iraq must disarm, and must do so pro-actively”.
Success in getting Iraq to disarm “by effective and credible inspections” would
be a great prize.
If Iraq failed to make use of the “last chance” provided in resolution 1441, and
continued its defiance, the Council would “have to make another grim choice,
based on the findings of the inspectors … And when that time comes, the
Council must face up to its responsibilities.”
In his experience, the Council met its responsibilities “best and most effectively
when its members work in unison. The Council should proceed in a determined,
reflective and deliberate manner. Its measures must be seen as firm, effective,
42  UN Security Council Press Release, 10 February 2003, Secretary-General says United Nations has duty
to exhaust all possibilities of peaceful settlement before resorting to use of force (SG/SM/8600).
210
Previous page | Contents | Next page