Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The views of Mr Blair and Sir Jeremy Greenstock
940.  The evidence set out in this Section demonstrates that, by the end of
January, Mr Blair had taken a public position that Iraq was failing fully to comply
with resolution 1441, and that this was a further material breach.
941.  Mr Blair told the Inquiry that Saddam Hussein:
“… was deliberately concealing documentation, and … he was deliberately
not allowing people to be interviewed properly.
“In December 2002 … we received information, and this information remains valid,
that Saddam called together his key people and said that anybody who agreed
to an interview outside of Iraq was to be treated as a spy.”312
942.  Mr Blair suggested that Saddam Hussein:
“… retained full intent to restart his programme, and, therefore, it was very
important for him that interviews did not take place, because the interviews with
senior regime members were precisely what would have indicated the concealment
and the intent.”313
943.  Asked whether there was a risk that, in putting down the second resolution the
UK would appear to be trying to curtail the inspection process because of the demands
of the military planning, Mr Blair replied:
“It was more … the other way round, that what we were trying to do was to say: ‘how
do you resolve what, on any basis, is a somewhat indistinct picture being painted by
Dr Blix?’”314
944.  In his memoir Mr Blair quoted at length from Dr Blix’s report of 27 January, which
he described as providing “essential context to understanding the decisions being taken
by me and others”.315
945.  Mr Blair wrote that the report was:
“… critical to understand the context in which WMD were being debated in the
run‑up to the outbreak of conflict. We the key allies had no doubt that Saddam
had an active WMD programme …
“There could be no doubt that the only reason for the inspectors being allowed back
into Iraq was a threat of military action. The build‑up of American forces was likewise
the only conceivable reason for what co‑operation there was. But the co‑operation
fell short of what resolution 1441 demanded. And the history of dealing with Saddam
did not exactly lead to belief in his fidelity to the UN.”
312  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, page 104.
313  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, pages 104‑105.
314  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, page 116.
315  Blair T. A Journey. Hutchinson, 2010.
172
Previous page | Contents | Next page