Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.6  |  Development of UK strategy and options, November 2002 to January 2003
SIR RICHARD DEARLOVE’S VISIT TO WASHINGTON, DECEMBER 2002
289.  During a visit to Washington in mid‑December, Sir Richard Dearlove
emphasised the need for sufficient evidence to make a convincing case that Iraq
had failed to abide by resolution 1441.
290.  During a discussion on 15 December, Sir Richard Dearlove told his interlocutor
that his impression from his meeting with Mr Blair on 11 December was that “HMG
would need clear evidence beyond an audit of the Iraqi declaration, to commit to
military action”.96
291.  Sir Richard reported a view that President Bush was relying on Mr Blair’s
assurances that HMG would be with the US.
292.  The report sent to Sir David Manning recorded that Sir Richard had discussed the
Iraq declaration and the need for a “road map” setting out the next steps with a number
of US officials.97
293.  Sir Richard had told one US official that, in addition to setting out clearly and
persuasively that Iraq had failed to abide by resolution 1441:
“… we needed to continue on parallel tracks designed to reinforce the case, and for
HMG, to give the PM sufficient evidence of a breach which the declaration by itself
did not. We needed:
a detailed audit of the declaration
to press the interview issue or force Saddam’s refusal to co‑operate
to prepare for the release of intelligence to prove deception
to press on with a rigorous inspection regime absent a ‘silver‑bullet’.”
294.  Sir Richard had said that “perhaps by the end of January all those elements
would have produced sufficient evidence to make the convincing case we needed”.
A “convincing defector or a revealing site inspection” would be preferable, “but we could
not depend on this”. He added later that “success was far from guaranteed”.
295.  In a separate conversation with another official, Sir Richard Dearlove had said that
he “estimated the chance of a successful operation to produce a defector or a smoking
gun at about 20 percent”.
296.  In a manuscript comment to Mr Blair, Sir David Manning wrote that “we should
go flat out” to find a defector or evidence in a site inspection.98
96  SIS Internal Record, 16 December 2002.
97  Letter PS/C to Sir David Manning, 18 December 2002, ‘Iraq: C’s Discussions in Washington
16‑17 December’ attaching Paper, ‘Iraq: C’s Discussion in Washington 16‑17 December’.
98  Manuscript comment Manning, 18 December 2002, on Paper, ‘Iraq: C’s Discussion in Washington
16‑17 December’.
53
Previous page | Contents | Next page